Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Guns Yes, Dogs No. [View all]Missycim
(950 posts)24. Hell to the no
I love dogs and have had two up until recently (I only have one now). I just find the op really clueless, dogs do way more damage to parks and forests then lawful CC carriers. I don't mean that dogs do a lot of damage its just very hard to find any stories of lawful carriers doing much damage at all. So if you have a handful of dogs pooping on the ground thats a ton more damage then CCer's do
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
48 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Well you know, an unholstered dog is pretty darn scary. They bark and growl and snarl.
geckosfeet
Oct 2012
#8
Interesting. I was first disappointed in Jefferson when I realized he was a slave owner. Now this.
Hoyt
Oct 2012
#34
Seems to me that the problem with both dogs & guns are the people that own them. n/t
Egalitarian Thug
Oct 2012
#47