General Discussion

calguy

(6,167 posts)

13. I seen good arguments on both sides of the question

Sat Feb 13, 2021, 09:53 AM

Feb 2021

I remain in favor of not calling witnesses and getting this thing behind us. There is ample time for Merrick Garland to fully and deeply investigate this entire situation once he gets confirmed. But he won't get confirmed until the impeachment trial is completed. As long as the Senate is bogged down with an impeachment trial that will STILL yield an acquittal is a waste of valuable time in my opinion.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

15 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Neal Katyal: Tomorrow is the day subpoenas can issue: [View all] soothsayer Feb 2021 OP

So, can they? bamagal62 Feb 2021 #1

Idk. Sounds so good soothsayer Feb 2021 #3

I sure hope so. MontanaMama Feb 2021 #2

Oh, I think most of them already know this... Manfred Arcane Feb 2021 #9

I'm confused because I thought they bamagal62 Feb 2021 #4

All 100 Senators agreed, no witnesses. former9thward Feb 2021 #10

I'm not sure I want to see this drag on too much longer calguy Feb 2021 #5

Well, that's true. However, I want bamagal62 Feb 2021 #6

I think we can walk and chew gum at the same time. dmr Feb 2021 #12

They can and should do all of these investigations StarfishSaver Feb 2021 #14

I agree 100%. SergeStorms Feb 2021 #7

I say let the sunshine in and let the subpoenas fly. It is better to lance this boil now even if it c-rational Feb 2021 #8

I've gone back and forth on the witness question. crickets Feb 2021 #11

I seen good arguments on both sides of the question calguy Feb 2021 #13

Our relationship is over BeerBarrelPolka Feb 2021 #15