Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

coalition_unwilling

(14,180 posts)
11. The primaries after April 1 are 'winner-take-all' as I understand it. That said, DUer GrantCart
Wed Jan 11, 2012, 12:30 AM
Jan 2012

Last edited Wed Jan 11, 2012, 11:48 PM - Edit history (1)

did some preliminary analysis in earlier threads that supports your hypothesis, i.e., that it will be all but impossible for any candidate to secure a majority of delegates on the first ballot.

The question, of course, is whether the also-rans can stay in and quasi-competitive until April 1. If they do, thereby denying Romney any significant delegate advantage, then it's a whole new ball game.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why the New Hampshire res...»Reply #11