Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: This message was self-deleted by its author [View all]TheBlackAdder
(29,981 posts)20. Pink & Blue, Girls & Boys
.
.
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
63 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Same with my daughter, boy's shoes for her wide feet. She didn't mind, but didn't want something
Irish_Dem
Mar 2021
#2
No!!! This is really dumb.They are just handing them a nice juicy cultural issue. Plus really?
Dream Girl
Mar 2021
#3
Watch what? I have a daughter and a son. I don't think having a combined department
pnwmom
Mar 2021
#27
I'm talking about wat the GOP will do with. They will liken this to "forcing boys and girls to wear
Dream Girl
Mar 2021
#28
I have four. While we're open and neutral, television, school, friends and their parents influence.
TheBlackAdder
Mar 2021
#50
Has any anthropologist ever stumbled upon some culture that didn't have gender stereotypes?
Klaralven
Mar 2021
#55
Yes, a few earlier Native American tribes. There are a few others, but can't recall them.
TheBlackAdder
Mar 2021
#58
You can research Native Americn Gender Roles. My books & manuals are all boxed away in storage.
TheBlackAdder
Mar 2021
#61
It sounds like the article is only saying signs for toys and child care items
Victor_c3
Mar 2021
#57
This is electoral madness. Might as well call it The Democratic Majority Sabotage Bill, and I am
Celerity
Mar 2021
#7
My youngest brother wanted a GI Joe and was ridiculed by all the males in my family
MagickMuffin
Mar 2021
#17
I had two boys, and I always noticed that the girls' clothing section
PoindexterOglethorpe
Mar 2021
#10
I think this is dumb. Even at early ages, boys' and girls' clothes need to be cut differently.
kysrsoze
Mar 2021
#15
What I'd like to see is a better range of clothing for different types of bodies
Bettie
Mar 2021
#33
They obviously have too much time on their hands. With all the problems we have going on
JohnSJ
Mar 2021
#22
No problemo. Put men's workpants in the same aisle as bras. People have plenty of time to shop
dalton99a
Mar 2021
#43
In the 1960s I bought a nice corduroy outdoor winter coat at a thrift store
left-of-center2012
Mar 2021
#34
Fuck the Sac Bee and their flamebait headline. This doesn't ban sections.
Alex4Martinez
Mar 2021
#44
This is so stupid. How about doing something about the shitty homeless situation instead????
beaglelover
Mar 2021
#59