Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

februari

(22 posts)
2. Breaking: Cuomo accuser to form PAC to primary Chuck Schumer, Gillibrand
Fri Mar 12, 2021, 08:54 PM
Mar 2021

"A former aide to Gov. Andrew Cuomo is planning to unleash a political action committee against Democratic Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer and Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand after they have so far failed to come forward to call on the New York governor to resign.

Lindsey Boylan, who accused Cuomo in a Medium post of kissing her without her consent among other allegations, said on Twitter that she plans to launch the PAC in an effort to primary Schumer, who is up for reelection next year, and Gillibrand, who is not up for reelection until 2025."
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/03/12/former-cuomo-aide-lindsey-boylan-plans-to-launch-pac-against-schumer-gillibrand-.html

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

No , someone else replaced him but that woman decided not to run JI7 Mar 2021 #1
Yes he was Dem4Life1102 Mar 2021 #4
I'm talking about OP saying Letitia James replaced him JI7 Mar 2021 #5
You asked how it was relevant Dem4Life1102 Mar 2021 #7
What did they need an investigation for ? JI7 Mar 2021 #11
Why wouldn't they? Dem4Life1102 Mar 2021 #12
He admitted to it but tried to claim it was some roleplaying thing JI7 Mar 2021 #14
Not when Cuomo called for him to resign. Dem4Life1102 Mar 2021 #16
He didn't have to resign but did so because he didn't want an investigation JI7 Mar 2021 #18
But the point is that Cuomo called for him to resign Dem4Life1102 Mar 2021 #19
Breaking: Cuomo accuser to form PAC to primary Chuck Schumer, Gillibrand februari Mar 2021 #2
That's... interesting. crickets Mar 2021 #6
Now this is starting to make sense Just_Vote_Dem Mar 2021 #8
This message was self-deleted by its author Budi Mar 2021 #17
+1000000 n/t Just_Vote_Dem Mar 2021 #21
This message was self-deleted by its author Budi Mar 2021 #23
OMG nt Grasswire2 Mar 2021 #26
Again this is a reason for an investigation. LakeArenal Mar 2021 #24
This message was self-deleted by its author Budi Mar 2021 #25
To primary both Schumer and Gillibrand Dem4Life1102 Mar 2021 #30
Not what the story says Dem4Life1102 Mar 2021 #31
Read what the story says Dem4Life1102 Mar 2021 #32
Post removed Post removed Mar 2021 #22
I don't understand the point here, thanks in advance uponit7771 Mar 2021 #3
And? So what Budi Mar 2021 #9
and he should have had an investigation as well dsc Mar 2021 #10
I think it was because of her age and how much the job involved JI7 Mar 2021 #13
that could be it dsc Mar 2021 #15
Do you have a link to this? madinmaryland Mar 2021 #20
So? crimycarny Mar 2021 #27
There was harder evidence against Schneiderman radius777 Mar 2021 #28
Upcoming election? Dem4Life1102 Mar 2021 #29
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»To those demanding that A...»Reply #2