Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RobinA

(9,893 posts)
12. Legally Speaking, Or To Get A Conviction?
Fri Apr 9, 2021, 12:07 PM
Apr 2021

I don't think a stated motive is ever required legally for a specific charge. With me as a juror there are some situations where you will need a motive to get a vote to convict of murder from me. This is not one of them, as I don't believe there was intent. To me this is some kind of extreme callous disregard, which I don't think is a charge, but something like that would allow me to vote to convict. No motive necessary. I can't remember what he ended up charged with. I think some level of murder got thrown back in, so I'm thinking the verdict is not going to make people happy. I find it unlikely that a jury is going to get to murder, although I don't know Minnesotans, so their mileage may vary.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Chauvin Trial: Will the ...»Reply #12