Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Yavin4

(37,182 posts)
4. People have deep-seeded biases and only accept data that confirm their biases.
Mon Apr 26, 2021, 09:21 AM
Apr 2021

Data that contradicts their biases is discarded.

The essence of human progress is testing biases against data and changing biases when the data calls for it.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The below normal are also interesting... Hugin Apr 2021 #1
Also, in 2020 the rate was a bit below normal, preumably from Hortensis Apr 2021 #3
Also, a transition from disease to injury over the last decade. Hugin Apr 2021 #12
Lol. I noticed that in the last of the umpteen years injury held at 6%. Hortensis Apr 2021 #13
diseases went down while accidents stayed more constant dsc Apr 2021 #15
There's a trend with the younger cohorts... Hugin Apr 2021 #16
Hmmm. Aside from spreading killer disease, we're doing better all the time. Hortensis Apr 2021 #29
this year is an exception of course dsc Apr 2021 #31
And with big recent advances, more are about to become far less deadly! Hortensis Apr 2021 #32
What do you mean that in 2020 the rate was a bit below normal - Ms. Toad Apr 2021 #27
Sorry, meant right before 2020, that little blue drop before the pandemic hit. nt Hortensis Apr 2021 #30
That's what I thought you probably meant. n/t Ms. Toad Apr 2021 #33
From the same article: Leading causes of death in the U.S. 2015-20 FakeNoose Apr 2021 #2
People have deep-seeded biases and only accept data that confirm their biases. Yavin4 Apr 2021 #4
They will say that d_r Apr 2021 #6
Maybe so, but they can't deny that the number of deaths in 2020 FakeNoose Apr 2021 #10
Heart disease didn't drop, look at the box size mathematic Apr 2021 #20
I understand completely d_r Apr 2021 #28
Haha, without a doubt we'll see that nonsense mathematic Apr 2021 #34
it *is* interesting d_r Apr 2021 #36
This is an excellent point. BigmanPigman Apr 2021 #41
They learned that from their lifelong religious training DBoon Apr 2021 #23
Science and Mathamatics are demonic instruments? /s irisblue Apr 2021 #19
Notice the big drop off in the death rate following the 1918 peak Silent3 Apr 2021 #5
I Don't Know modrepub Apr 2021 #11
It has probably already begun FBaggins Apr 2021 #22
larger Image: Towlie Apr 2021 #7
+1 dalton99a Apr 2021 #9
And how many of the above normal spikes correlate to recessions? dickthegrouch Apr 2021 #8
I'm going to take that as partially meaning Johonny Apr 2021 #14
The food wasn't very good either. n/t Hugin Apr 2021 #17
Things like indoor plumbing PatSeg Apr 2021 #21
Not to mention infant and maternal mortality TexasBushwhacker Apr 2021 #38
Yes, that's true PatSeg Apr 2021 #39
public health was in its infancy DBoon Apr 2021 #24
That's better illustrated by the "Death rate in the US over time" graph FBaggins Apr 2021 #26
KnRnBookmark Hekate Apr 2021 #18
This COVID thing is one persistent and potent hoax, isn't it? BobTheSubgenius Apr 2021 #25
Since roughly 1940 stopdiggin Apr 2021 #35
Womp womp womp for the trolls Blue Owl Apr 2021 #37
Kick! sarcasmo Apr 2021 #40
Even allowing for the fact that the US had only a little over a 100 million people back in 1918 cstanleytech Apr 2021 #42
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»COVID trolls went nuts ov...»Reply #4