Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

d_r

(6,908 posts)
28. I understand completely
Mon Apr 26, 2021, 01:51 PM
Apr 2021

the difference between percentages and counts. Let me remind you of who we are talking about, and take the liberty of penning a reply for them:

"Um, heart disease was 23% in 2019 and 21% in 2020! It is right in the chart! You should learn to read, libtard. And that is just what they will admit. If they will admit that, think about how bad it really is. Wake up, sheeple."

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The below normal are also interesting... Hugin Apr 2021 #1
Also, in 2020 the rate was a bit below normal, preumably from Hortensis Apr 2021 #3
Also, a transition from disease to injury over the last decade. Hugin Apr 2021 #12
Lol. I noticed that in the last of the umpteen years injury held at 6%. Hortensis Apr 2021 #13
diseases went down while accidents stayed more constant dsc Apr 2021 #15
There's a trend with the younger cohorts... Hugin Apr 2021 #16
Hmmm. Aside from spreading killer disease, we're doing better all the time. Hortensis Apr 2021 #29
this year is an exception of course dsc Apr 2021 #31
And with big recent advances, more are about to become far less deadly! Hortensis Apr 2021 #32
What do you mean that in 2020 the rate was a bit below normal - Ms. Toad Apr 2021 #27
Sorry, meant right before 2020, that little blue drop before the pandemic hit. nt Hortensis Apr 2021 #30
That's what I thought you probably meant. n/t Ms. Toad Apr 2021 #33
From the same article: Leading causes of death in the U.S. 2015-20 FakeNoose Apr 2021 #2
People have deep-seeded biases and only accept data that confirm their biases. Yavin4 Apr 2021 #4
They will say that d_r Apr 2021 #6
Maybe so, but they can't deny that the number of deaths in 2020 FakeNoose Apr 2021 #10
Heart disease didn't drop, look at the box size mathematic Apr 2021 #20
I understand completely d_r Apr 2021 #28
Haha, without a doubt we'll see that nonsense mathematic Apr 2021 #34
it *is* interesting d_r Apr 2021 #36
This is an excellent point. BigmanPigman Apr 2021 #41
They learned that from their lifelong religious training DBoon Apr 2021 #23
Science and Mathamatics are demonic instruments? /s irisblue Apr 2021 #19
Notice the big drop off in the death rate following the 1918 peak Silent3 Apr 2021 #5
I Don't Know modrepub Apr 2021 #11
It has probably already begun FBaggins Apr 2021 #22
larger Image: Towlie Apr 2021 #7
+1 dalton99a Apr 2021 #9
And how many of the above normal spikes correlate to recessions? dickthegrouch Apr 2021 #8
I'm going to take that as partially meaning Johonny Apr 2021 #14
The food wasn't very good either. n/t Hugin Apr 2021 #17
Things like indoor plumbing PatSeg Apr 2021 #21
Not to mention infant and maternal mortality TexasBushwhacker Apr 2021 #38
Yes, that's true PatSeg Apr 2021 #39
public health was in its infancy DBoon Apr 2021 #24
That's better illustrated by the "Death rate in the US over time" graph FBaggins Apr 2021 #26
KnRnBookmark Hekate Apr 2021 #18
This COVID thing is one persistent and potent hoax, isn't it? BobTheSubgenius Apr 2021 #25
Since roughly 1940 stopdiggin Apr 2021 #35
Womp womp womp for the trolls Blue Owl Apr 2021 #37
Kick! sarcasmo Apr 2021 #40
Even allowing for the fact that the US had only a little over a 100 million people back in 1918 cstanleytech Apr 2021 #42
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»COVID trolls went nuts ov...»Reply #28