Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

hlthe2b

(113,289 posts)

2. For an appeal they will need one hell of a lot more than this.

Reply to Sogo (Original post)

Tue May 4, 2021, 11:10 AM

May 2021

Meh. He was asked in voir dire about relevant protests and answered honestly apparently. The MLK march WAS not an anti-police march at all.

If you watch RW media, undoubtedly you will get a far more hysterical take, but this is not going to earn him a new trial.

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

27 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

No one here talking about the Chauvin juror who possibly has a conflict of interest.... [View all] Sogo May 2021 OP

Oy ve! Beakybird May 2021 #1

For an appeal they will need one hell of a lot more than this. hlthe2b May 2021 #2

Not RW media, but a story by AP being carried on MSM and Sogo May 2021 #3

My statement said if you were listening to the discussion of the story on RW media you will get a hlthe2b May 2021 #5

And my reply was to say that I'm NOT listening to RW media, nor their attorneys. Sogo May 2021 #8

I am not saying you are. I am saying to the wider world, that those hearing this from RW media hlthe2b May 2021 #10

Fair enough.... Sogo May 2021 #11

... hlthe2b May 2021 #12

AP repeats too many MAGA Media headlines, politicos at AP don't police their editors uponit7771 May 2021 #16

Agree. NoMoreRepugs May 2021 #6

Well, we have to allow jurors to have opinions and lives dawg day May 2021 #4

The judge could easily declare a mistrial. Calista241 May 2021 #7

Not a conflict of interest. OneBro May 2021 #9

The right only cares about the minute (and irrelevant) details when the lose the argument Dawson Leery May 2021 #13

This continues to be othering. cilla4progress May 2021 #14

THIS IrishAfricanAmerican May 2021 #22

... cilla4progress May 2021 #25

FWIW, ScratchCat May 2021 #15

Chauvin's attorney seems to be a straight shooter and not a firebrand type of guy. Calista241 May 2021 #17

I doubt a mistrial will be declared. Elessar Zappa May 2021 #18

Yeah, let the judge StarlightGold May 2021 #20

there can't be a mistrial now... right? WarGamer May 2021 #26

Nope, sarisataka May 2021 #19

If the fuckers declare a mistrial, the cost will be very high. David__77 May 2021 #21

This is a nothingburger. IrishAfricanAmerican May 2021 #23

weren't the jurors asked/told not to speak out until after the sentencing? IcyPeas May 2021 #24

No one is talking about it because it doesn't matter kcr May 2021 #27