General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Nomadland Exposes the Middle-Class Rip-Off [View all]Jetheels
(991 posts)I did not understand the term nomad. Or how Ferns sister referred to her as like a pioneer.
The way I understand things is that if your living in a van, shitting in a bucket, etc, cannot afford to repair the van, cannot afford to pay to park the van in a lot at night, then you are not a nomad but you are homeless. My friend said I did not understand that a lot of people choose this nomad life because they like it. I also didnt understand some of the people in the campfire circle did actually seem to be choosing this life as they said they used to be high up on the corporate ladder so must have money. One lady seemed well off and offered Fern a place to live whenever if she wanted. I think I was upset because if I were house less, had no money, lived in a vehicle, shit in a bucket in the van, I would not want anyone calling me a pioneer, or nomad. I think calling it nomad is romanticizing homelessness. I did not understand the movie Nomadland, suffice to say. If anyone can explain me this thank you. I think theres a huge difference between living in a van thats falling apart, etc, and traveling the country in a vehicle that has a lot of amenities and you can afford to park it wherever you want, can pay for repairs etc. that to me is going on vacation in=n a camper. I felt like Nomadland threw together vacationers in vehicles with homekess people in vehicles. I dont know, I did not in any way understand Nomadland. I was upset by it. It seemed to romanticize homelessness. Also, what, in the end Fern is going to drive back to the David Stratham characters kids multi million dollar ranch? Tbh, I thought Nomadland was a colossal mess of confusion.