Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: This message was self-deleted by its author [View all]Recovered Repug
(1,518 posts)83. Actually, that's not quite true.
There are requirements that the citizen parent must meet for the child to have US citizenship. Prior to 1986 they were:
1. The person's parents were married at the time of birth
2. One of the person's parents was a U.S. citizen when the person was born
3. The citizen parent lived at least ten years in the United States before the child's birth;
4. A minimum of 5 of these 10 years in the United States were after the citizen parent's 14th birthday.
Since Obama's mother was only 18 years old at the time of his birth, requirement #4 would not have been met. In theory, if Obama was born overseas he would not be considered a Natural Born Citizen and eligible to be president.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_nationality_law
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
86 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
But I thought as long as one parent was a US Citizen then you are an American Citizen
LynneSin
Oct 2012
#10
ding...whichmkes the birther shit that much more stupid. even is he WAS born in kenya.. still
dionysus
Oct 2012
#27
It also means he should have "self-deported" by Mitt's immigration standards.
Barack_America
Oct 2012
#6
I'm no expert on 1907 immigration law, but by todays' standards "steps" would need to be taken.
Barack_America
Oct 2012
#21
No. George's parents were US Citizens at the time of his birth, making George a USC.
leveymg
Oct 2012
#35
That's an interesting question. But, it's likely that anyone who was born in Utah became a USC
leveymg
Oct 2012
#59
I never said they renounced but that they fled the country so they could practice Polygamy
LynneSin
Oct 2012
#17
Okay, so the children of draft evaders who went to Canada are not US citizens?
jberryhill
Oct 2012
#23
"Native-born" US Citz means not Naturalized. Romney was born a USC, so no need.
leveymg
Oct 2012
#12
USC by birth not conveyed under any "uniform rules for naturalization". Concepts are exclusive.
leveymg
Oct 2012
#31
No. If he had been naturalized, he'd be a citizen by law. The INA may contain definitions, but does
leveymg
Oct 2012
#49
Yes. But, Mittens -- and Obama -- were born citizens, regardless of the nationality of parents
leveymg
Oct 2012
#64
imagine if Obama's grandparents FLED THE UNITED STATES to engage in polygamy? just imagine....
spanone
Oct 2012
#13
Most human beings, being human beings, have two grandmothers: one maternal; one paternal.
WinkyDink
Oct 2012
#41
"so they could flee US government persecution" --- I'll have to take issue with "persecution"; it's
WinkyDink
Oct 2012
#36
My niece was born on the island of Okinawa, but she is a US citizen and will be qualified...
slackmaster
Oct 2012
#42
Yes, you are correct. 25 for the House, 30 for the Senate, 35 for President.
slackmaster
Oct 2012
#48
I believe that it only applied to those born in the "Canal Zone" - considered a US territory.
IggleDoer
Oct 2012
#68
Seriously? Why do people feel compelled to play the same idiotic game that teabaggers
cali
Oct 2012
#63
I'm not trying to start a birther movement nor do any of us question Mitt's citizenship
LynneSin
Oct 2012
#74
I'm sorry, but none of this has anything to do with THIS election, does it? nt.
OldDem2012
Oct 2012
#79