Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: DOJ notifies the court that it will appeal a judge's order to release a March 2019 memo [View all]Takket
(23,875 posts)7. some context before we burn Garland at the stake...
https://www.reuters.com/business/legal/us-attorney-general-garland-weighs-release-trump-era-obstruction-memo-2021-05-21/
There are competing interests that Garland must balance in making his decision even if he may personally disapprove of Barr's conduct, said Bradley Moss, a national security lawyer in Washington who has been following the litigation.
An appeal would signal to civil servants in the Justice Department that Garland will back them in court when they come under fire, Moss said.
"For Garland, one interest here is the need to defend the honor and integrity of the department," Moss said. "The competing interest, of course, is the desire for some transparency."
~snip~
Garland may simply be going through the motions on this to help eliminate any sort of appearance of bias by rushing to release the memo. I think he's wasting his time since the drumpf party will eviscerate him no matter what happens, even if an appellate court turns him upside down and shakes the memo out of his pockets.
As for defending the honor of the department, i have a hart time believing people in DOJ see it that way. They spent 4 years watching Session and Barr trample every norm, every matter of honor, and lifetimes of work or loyal public servants that were reticulated, humiliated, branded traitors and fired. I find it hard to believe they want to see this dragged out so they will know Garland "has their back". I would think they would see "having their back" as exposing what Barr did to their once beloved DOJ.
But that's just my opinion. I don't work within those walls.
There are competing interests that Garland must balance in making his decision even if he may personally disapprove of Barr's conduct, said Bradley Moss, a national security lawyer in Washington who has been following the litigation.
An appeal would signal to civil servants in the Justice Department that Garland will back them in court when they come under fire, Moss said.
"For Garland, one interest here is the need to defend the honor and integrity of the department," Moss said. "The competing interest, of course, is the desire for some transparency."
~snip~
Garland may simply be going through the motions on this to help eliminate any sort of appearance of bias by rushing to release the memo. I think he's wasting his time since the drumpf party will eviscerate him no matter what happens, even if an appellate court turns him upside down and shakes the memo out of his pockets.
As for defending the honor of the department, i have a hart time believing people in DOJ see it that way. They spent 4 years watching Session and Barr trample every norm, every matter of honor, and lifetimes of work or loyal public servants that were reticulated, humiliated, branded traitors and fired. I find it hard to believe they want to see this dragged out so they will know Garland "has their back". I would think they would see "having their back" as exposing what Barr did to their once beloved DOJ.
But that's just my opinion. I don't work within those walls.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
60 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
DOJ notifies the court that it will appeal a judge's order to release a March 2019 memo [View all]
Nevilledog
May 2021
OP
Protecting the Presidency or Presidential power is the absolute wrong decision given the
KPN
May 2021
#38
Even so, Takket, it does help a little toward a better understanding of possible motivation.
calimary
May 2021
#60
I wonder if the DOJ is doing this to try to keep the Biden administration above the fray.
LaMouffette
May 2021
#8
They're likely trying to protect their own and future administration's documents
StarfishSaver
May 2021
#12
"This is what Garland has done: Normalizing an abnormal framing and an abnormal memo"
Grasswire2
May 2021
#11
I think they are appealing it (or part of it) in a largely performative attempt to show
Ocelot II
May 2021
#14
I think we can assume the Biden administration has good reasons for everything they do
StarfishSaver
May 2021
#30