General Discussion

StarfishSaver

(18,486 posts)

25. Yes, he knows a lot. It doesn't mean he's always right

Mon May 24, 2021, 10:11 PM

May 2021

I don't agree with him on this.

I have more legal experience than you have, but that doesn't stop you from regularly challenging me.

It's like that. Except I actually have experience with what Katyal is talking about.

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

60 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

DOJ notifies the court that it will appeal a judge's order to release a March 2019 memo [View all] Nevilledog May 2021 OP

ohhh-boy! keep us posted... FirstLight May 2021 #1

Just covered with Schiff and MSNBC Grasswire2 May 2021 #2

They're not trying to protect the Barr memo StarfishSaver May 2021 #9

Protecting the Presidency or Presidential power is the absolute wrong decision given the KPN May 2021 #38

It's actually the right decision here StarfishSaver May 2021 #40

Schiff says BIG MISTAKE Grasswire2 May 2021 #3

So is Neal Katyal. BigmanPigman May 2021 #19

Damn dflprincess May 2021 #4

Biden DOJ is protecting the memo from release. Grasswire2 May 2021 #5

Tune in now to hear Katyal response to this news. nt Grasswire2 May 2021 #6

some context before we burn Garland at the stake... Takket May 2021 #7

I think this is right StarfishSaver May 2021 #15

Honor & Integrity Snackshack May 2021 #43

+1 uponit7771 May 2021 #53

Even so, Takket, it does help a little toward a better understanding of possible motivation. calimary May 2021 #60

I wonder if the DOJ is doing this to try to keep the Biden administration above the fray. LaMouffette May 2021 #8

They're likely trying to protect their own and future administration's documents StarfishSaver May 2021 #12

That makes sense. I bet you're right. LaMouffette May 2021 #18

Neal Katyal: "This is the people's memo" Grasswire2 May 2021 #10

"This is what Garland has done: Normalizing an abnormal framing and an abnormal memo" Grasswire2 May 2021 #11

Not shocked at this appeal by Garland's DOJ GoodRaisin May 2021 #13

I think they are appealing it (or part of it) in a largely performative attempt to show Ocelot II May 2021 #14

This StarfishSaver May 2021 #17

I just read the notice of appeal. Ocelot II May 2021 #23

This sounds good StarfishSaver May 2021 #32

Yes, cilla4progress May 2021 #35

This appeal will take A YEAR to process... Grasswire2 May 2021 #16

I don't agree with Katyal that it will take a year StarfishSaver May 2021 #20

He, having argued cases before SCOTUS, has a little advantage here. nt Grasswire2 May 2021 #22

Yes, he knows a lot. It doesn't mean he's always right StarfishSaver May 2021 #25

Did you stay in a Holiday Inn Express last night? dem4decades May 2021 #24

Didn't need to StarfishSaver May 2021 #27

Gee. Dershowitz has a similar CV. nt Grasswire2 May 2021 #31

Lol StarfishSaver May 2021 #33

The plaintiff/appellee can ask for an expedited hearing, I think. Ocelot II May 2021 #26

They can StarfishSaver May 2021 #28

Betcha they'll do it. Ocelot II May 2021 #29

I hope there is a very good reason for this Cetacea May 2021 #21

I think we can assume the Biden administration has good reasons for everything they do StarfishSaver May 2021 #30

That is certainly my default condition. BobTheSubgenius May 2021 #41

They are kind of walking a tightrope - arguing that there are situations Ocelot II May 2021 #34

Thank you for your measured reply, Ocelot II Cetacea May 2021 #37

Ocelot is dead on StarfishSaver May 2021 #39

or , they just might re-open the Russia mess to get to the bottom of it ?? monkeyman1 May 2021 #36

Well, I had hope... Snackshack May 2021 #42

Why would you say "Dems won't pass voting rights"? StarfishSaver May 2021 #44

Your. Snackshack May 2021 #46

Nowhere in that hot mess of a word salad did you answer my question StarfishSaver May 2021 #47

The answer is there. Snackshack May 2021 #48

No wonder you couldn't/won't answer the question StarfishSaver May 2021 #51

It was Sarah Kendzior who tweeted that moonscape May 2021 #50

Nice catch StarfishSaver May 2021 #52

Giving Kendzior, who tweeted this moonscape May 2021 #49

Right ... do all this is 4 months ?! The "phucking" is in the wrong information you got on how fast uponit7771 May 2021 #55

"CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON" Justice matters. May 2021 #45

Why??????? UCmeNdc May 2021 #54

Good answers from StarFishSaver here (link) uponit7771 May 2021 #56

Happy fitzmas everyone Fullduplexxx May 2021 #57

Interesting comments. kentuck May 2021 #58

Kick Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin May 2021 #59