Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Sherman A1

(38,958 posts)

3. I don't believe taxpayers should have to replace material and equipment

Reply to duforsure (Reply #2)

Thu May 27, 2021, 04:17 AM

May 2021

Damaged by these audits, but that would be up to the local and state authorities to determine an outcome. Failing that a group with standing in the issue would have to file the suit for damages.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Could the people and companies ignoring audit protocol be sued, [View all] duforsure May 2021 OP

Anyone can be sued for pretty much anything Sherman A1 May 2021 #1

But why should the taxpayers have to pay for new machines? duforsure May 2021 #2

I don't believe taxpayers should have to replace material and equipment Sherman A1 May 2021 #3

Taxpayers having to foot the bill for new machines will backfire on these republicans duforsure May 2021 #4

Yes, it is Truman Sherman A1 May 2021 #5

Could DOJ file criminal charges for ignoring protocols? duforsure May 2021 #6

Sued? Maine Abu El Banat May 2021 #7

Depends how their contract is written Takket May 2021 #8

Rachel talked about this last night. gab13by13 May 2021 #9

The judge gave them that right, but not to corrupt the ballots , or machines, duforsure May 2021 #10

Thanks for the explanation, gab13by13 May 2021 #11