Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Homeowner Refusing to Remove 'F*** Biden,' Pro-Trump Flags Faces $500-a-Day Fine [View all]
sarisataka
(22,183 posts)20. To paraphrase-
I completely disagree with what you say, but fully support your right to say it without being fined.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
132 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Homeowner Refusing to Remove 'F*** Biden,' Pro-Trump Flags Faces $500-a-Day Fine [View all]
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
Jun 2021
OP
If she chooses to fight this and work it up through the courts, some group out there will take up
In It to Win It
Jun 2021
#28
I think the borough is going to pay through the nose for violating
MarineCombatEngineer
Jun 2021
#25
You're right, and yet here we are once again at DU, with people just not understanding what
mahatmakanejeeves
Jun 2021
#91
They have code restrictions on the size of signs, but they can't regulate
MarineCombatEngineer
Jun 2021
#114
Nope...there are kids that live there and this has been adjudicated. All the battles have been
Demsrule86
Jun 2021
#66
You would think that even a small town in NJ would have access to competant legal advice...
PoliticAverse
Jun 2021
#11
It's good to be preiodically reminded that it is not just members of the right that are enemies
PoliticAverse
Jun 2021
#23
The town is going to lose badly and she will not pay one cent on those fines,
MarineCombatEngineer
Jun 2021
#57
Personally speaking, no flags are worth this amount of trouble. I enjoy my peace much more than
In It to Win It
Jun 2021
#24
How do you figure that she is going to go broke just to own the libs?
MarineCombatEngineer
Jun 2021
#32
She's not going to pay a cent while this winds it's way through the courts,
MarineCombatEngineer
Jun 2021
#37
Sorry, i know that's low. I usually don't ever do this in real life, but for some reason
smirkymonkey
Jun 2021
#95
Went to link. "Ooops. that page not found." She sounds like a vile *&@t. nt
Progressive Jones
Jun 2021
#106
So how about graphic images? They are considered free speech but are regulated.
bucolic_frolic
Jun 2021
#47
I have a mask that says Fuck Trump with an extended middle finger,
MarineCombatEngineer
Jun 2021
#50
It makes me sick when I see trump flags flying but I have no problem with them having free speech.
Ka-Dinh Oy
Jun 2021
#58
And you may lecture people on the obvious... and that is your right under our 1a
LanternWaste
Jun 2021
#78
These words would quickly lose all their offensive impact if we just allowed them
Goodheart
Jun 2021
#72
Depends on the state. NJ for example has limited the ability of HOA's to restrict political signage.
PoliticAverse
Jun 2021
#53
Utility poles are owned by someone, and it's not the person putting the signs on the poles.
mahatmakanejeeves
Jun 2021
#83
Restrictions on political speech are subject to the strictest of strict scrutiny
Azathoth
Jun 2021
#63
It's yet one more thread at DU that makes me proud to say I went to George Mason Elementary School.
mahatmakanejeeves
Jun 2021
#88