What judge approved all of these DOJ supoenas?

[csziggy]

14. She was involved in the Flynn case

DOJ’s Response To Flynn Misconduct Evidence Only Makes Them Look Worse
By Margot Cleveland
June 18, 2020

{SNIP}

Then came this disconcerting passage: “The government disclosed approximately 25 pages of documents in April and May 2020 as the result of an independent review of this case by the United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Missouri. While those documents, along with other recently available information, see, e.g., Doc. 198-6, are relevant to the government’s discretionary decision to dismiss this case, the government’s motion is not based on defendant Flynn’s broad allegations of prosecutorial misconduct. Flynn’s allegations are unfounded and provide no basis for impugning the prosecutors from the D.C. United States Attorney’s Office.”

This passage proves disconcerting for several reasons. First, the paragraph’s construction creates the false impression that there was no prosecutorial misconduct involved, while, in reality, it does not say that at all. Rather, Assistant U.S. Attorney Jocelyn Ballantine, who signed the brief, merely asserted in the government’s brief that it’s “motion is not based on defendant Flynn’s broad allegations of prosecutorial misconduct.”

But what about narrow and specific allegations of prosecutorial misconduct and specifically Powell’s claim that federal prosecutor Brandon Van Grack—who has since withdrawn from the case—improperly withheld material exculpatory evidence from Powell?

More: https://thefederalist.com/2020/06/18/dojs-response-to-flynn-misconduct-evidence-only-makes-them-look-worse/

ETA - Sorry about the source, but when she's pissed off even the right wing, she can't be all that competent.