Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Danascot

(5,178 posts)
20. Joe Manchin's "highly suspicious" reversal on voting bill follows donation from corporate lobby
Thu Jul 1, 2021, 02:33 PM
Jul 2021

Sen. Joe Manchin, the West Virginia Democrat famous for his vow to maintain the Senate filibuster and thereby scuttle much of President Biden's agenda, recently published an op-ed opposing the For the People Act, Democrats' whopping voting-rights bill. That article strongly echoed talking points from the U.S. Chamber of Commerce — and appeared shortly after the influential pro-business lobby resumed donations to Manchin's campaign after nearly a decade.

Manchin, who co-sponsored the sweeping voting rights legislation in 2019 and has supported filibuster reform in the past, became the first Senate Democrat to oppose the bill this week while reiterating his opposition to changing the filibuster, a key roadblock to voting reform. Skeptical members of Manchin's party have questioned the reasons for his opposition, especially after after a recent poll found that a majority of West Virginia voters support changing the filibuster rules and that 79% of the state's voters — including a large majority of Republicans — support the For the People Act.

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., suggested that Manchin's opposition to the proposal and filibuster reform may really be about measures in the bill aimed at cracking down on lobbyists and dark money.

"This is probably just as much a part of Joe Manchin's calculus than anything else," she told MSNBC on Tuesday. "You look at the Koch brothers and you look at organizations like the Heritage Foundation and conservative lobby groups that are doing a victory lap ... over the fact that Manchin refuses to change on the filibuster. And I think that these two things are very closely intertwined."

https://www.salon.com/2021/06/10/joe-manchins-highly-suspicious-reversal-on-voting-bill-follows-donation-from-corporate-lobby/

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

She just wrote a strong reason to add four more seats to that bench. lagomorph777 Jul 2021 #1
Yep. Bettie Jul 2021 #2
As many as 10 votes short of 50. speak easy Jul 2021 #15
Yes she did. flying_wahini Jul 2021 #3
Joe Manchin Don't Care FoxNewsSucks Jul 2021 #4
We know what he does care about though. ($$$ and political longevity) lagomorph777 Jul 2021 #6
You're completely right. FoxNewsSucks Jul 2021 #7
Oh, but don't you know? Ligyron Jul 2021 #11
I think the time is being stored next to the dry powder. FoxNewsSucks Jul 2021 #12
Do tell..please what would you have the Dems do with a 50-50 split, a tie breaker and PortTack Jul 2021 #17
A few weeks ago, someone posted a good answer to that. FoxNewsSucks Jul 2021 #30
Joe Manchin's "highly suspicious" reversal on voting bill follows donation from corporate lobby Danascot Jul 2021 #20
Exactly. We just have to out-bid the GQP. lagomorph777 Jul 2021 #23
Stacey Abrams has endorsed Manchin's proposed amendments to S1 Fiendish Thingy Jul 2021 #10
thank you HCHS '77 musette_sf Jul 2021 #5
I'll say "Hunter College High School" before anyone Ilsa Jul 2021 #8
Yep. musette_sf Jul 2021 #13
Party before The Law and Country - they are a disgrace to Democracy. NoMoreRepugs Jul 2021 #9
The Supreme Cons are out of the closet. All the way. dchill Jul 2021 #14
You haven't seen anything yet. LiberatedUSA Jul 2021 #27
Vision of Things to Come RVN VET71 Jul 2021 #16
(D)'s Presidential Candidates have received more votes than (R)'s ... aggiesal Jul 2021 #18
We need to select SC justices with a better sense of timing fescuerescue Jul 2021 #22
"[Despise so many of the rw on the Court]" ShazzieB Jul 2021 #19
we are stuck with these rwjncons for decades to come . id love to see supreme ct reform AllaN01Bear Jul 2021 #21
'accusing them of ignoring the legislative intent of the 1965 Voting Rights Act as well elleng Jul 2021 #24
Seems so flagrant. empedocles Jul 2021 #25
This message was self-deleted by its author empedocles Jul 2021 #26
Mr President, it's time to some amazing things to save Democracy. rickyhall Jul 2021 #28
It shows us we can't count on the Supreme Court to do our work for us anymore. gulliver Jul 2021 #29
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Very strong dissent. Jus...»Reply #20