Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: This message was self-deleted by its author [View all]brooklynite
(96,882 posts)94. ...and those decisions are up to the AG who serves at the pleasure of the President..
Im willing to accept that framing a pros caution is not an instantaneous to do des even if else know hes guilty. You claim that this is an intentional decision by the ruling class; but the decision being made is by AG Garland, and President Biden is keeping him in office. So what am I getting wrong?
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
94 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
So you're saying that the Democratic Attorney General intentionally will NOT indict him?
brooklynite
Sep 2021
#8
Mueller handed him 10 counts of obstruction and nothing has been done about it
Fullduplexxx
Sep 2021
#46
Corporate Oligarchy is a better description IMO. The 1% Go unpunished ALL THE TIME
Tommymac
Sep 2021
#79
Failing to arrest a war criminal or a mass murderer, just because they used the Presidency
lagomorph777
Sep 2021
#59
Follow the money trail from the treasury to Afganistan, Iraq and then back to Haliburton...
lees1975
Sep 2021
#77
Without 100% slam dunk, open/shut case I'm GLAD he hasn't been arrested ... YET. Get the evidence
uponit7771
Sep 2021
#7
Yes, Putin's Whore saying he's going to go down to the capital with the people is a start ...
uponit7771
Sep 2021
#13
What YOU think is a slam-dunk and what a prosecutor can get 12 jurors to agree is a crime beyond
StarfishSaver
Sep 2021
#49
I personally don't think he will ever be convicted by any jury...they will all have
Demsrule86
Sep 2021
#50
Serious answer: criminal prosecution takes longer than it does on LAW & ORDER.....
brooklynite
Sep 2021
#9
So the US Attorney General, appointed by President Biden, is engaged in a charade?
brooklynite
Sep 2021
#44
Nope I doubt he will be charged ...he is out of office...and lets hope he lose most of his money.
Demsrule86
Sep 2021
#51
Wait...so he can't be charged while in office, and he can't be charged because he's out of office...
lagomorph777
Sep 2021
#64
Haldeman, Erlichman, Colson, etc. were not arrested within months of the crime
StarfishSaver
Sep 2021
#52
New York's AG, having filed 15 felony charges against Trump Org, is heading in that direction.
ancianita
Sep 2021
#82
Most prosecutors won't indict white collar crime unless they are sure of a conviction
Fiendish Thingy
Sep 2021
#54
Mitchell and the other Watergate defendants were indicted while Nixon was still president.
former9thward
Sep 2021
#75
The establishment does not want to set a precedent of indicting and trying former Presidents...
Thomas Hurt
Sep 2021
#61
Trump figured out pretty quickly once he was in office that he would be immune to prosecution from
jalan48
Sep 2021
#66
...and those decisions are up to the AG who serves at the pleasure of the President..
brooklynite
Sep 2021
#94