Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

duforsure

(11,885 posts)
19. No , but,
Sat Sep 25, 2021, 10:29 AM
Sep 2021

It could be corruptly used by either party for financial, or political gains, putting them above the law. I also want them to have consequences instead of hearing a what's good for the country bs excuse.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

it would take a Constitutional amendment, which will never happen Celerity Sep 2021 #1
I know it would take a lot to get it done, duforsure Sep 2021 #2
It is not possible to 'corruption-proof' the US Constitution Celerity Sep 2021 #5
You're right, duforsure Sep 2021 #8
Well, we are trying, but the system is too gamed, has too many blockages and choke Celerity Sep 2021 #12
True a out "corruption-proofing" the Constitution StarfishSaver Sep 2021 #21
Nope. Cattledog Sep 2021 #3
What if Liz Chenney republicans joined in? duforsure Sep 2021 #4
You will never get 2/3rds of Congress NOR 38 states to agree. Celerity Sep 2021 #6
At this point they may True Blue American Sep 2021 #11
Zero chance of a Constitutional Amendment passing on this. Celerity Sep 2021 #13
I think we just need to take a way TFGs pardon power by Tomconroy Sep 2021 #7
This StarfishSaver Sep 2021 #22
It needs to be limited. True Blue American Sep 2021 #9
Agree. onetexan Sep 2021 #10
Impeachment/removal is a much lower bar than limitation by amendment FBaggins Sep 2021 #14
Excellent point. StarfishSaver Sep 2021 #24
Yes. Bluethroughu Sep 2021 #15
No, it can't be taken away first of all... Demsrule86 Sep 2021 #16
Need to remove the unwritten professional courtesy of new presidents not Hotler Sep 2021 #17
Are you concerned that Biden sarisataka Sep 2021 #18
No , but, duforsure Sep 2021 #19
No. StarfishSaver Sep 2021 #20
Some questions UnderThisLaw Sep 2021 #23
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Is it time now to take aw...»Reply #19