Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

genxlib

(6,163 posts)
12. I am going to be a dissenting voice here.
Fri Oct 29, 2021, 02:14 PM
Oct 2021

Having worked with a whole bunch of Architects, I will say politely that they are prone to drama. This guy grabbed his ball and went home but I know plenty of people like him.

I will say that as an Engineer and former college student, I would really like this building. Furthermore, as the father of a college student, I would like this building for my daughter better than anything she has access to now.

I suggest you actually look at the proposal on this document starting page 50ish https://www.dfss.ucsb.edu/sites/default/files/docs/dcs/DRC%20Meeting%20Packet%2010.05.21.pdf

First off, the building has two primary entrances but it has lots of exits. There are codes for such things and it will be fine.

I understand the lack of windows but I think that belies the way it should be used. They have single bunk rooms that should be for little more than sleeping and the most private of studying. Then I think of it as concentric circles of space and social activity; clusters of 8 around a living space and clusters of 64 sharing your own kitchen, game room and lounge. Then an expanded community to the whole building with a ton of different amenities and shared spaces of all kinds. I actually love this model as an ideal balance between privacy when you need it and community when you don't. My only complaint is that more of the common spaces need lounging furniture rather than dining type tables and chairs but that is a minor thing.

I know it is criticized as being a social experiment. Well I've got news for you; all college living is a social experiment. When my only child lived with seven people in a suite last year it was a social experiment. Being stuck in a double room where you never have the option of being alone is a social experiment. There are no ideal solutions but I like the ones that give kids the options for privacy while pushing for some degree of social interaction

Sure it would it be better if it spread out enough to allow each cluster to have windows. But clearly they are hurting for space and need the rooms. I can tell you that I would rather live in this on campus than be forced to be a commuter because there weren't enough beds available. We are dealing with that now because my daughter is being kicked off campus because they don't have any room for Juniors and Seniors. I would choose this for her in a heartbeat.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

UC Santa Barbara planned a dorm for 4,500 students with few windows and only 2 exits FelineOverlord Oct 2021 #1
Yikes...if you built it ("just so") they will come, and I will pay for it Backseat Driver Oct 2021 #7
Munger is vice-chairman of mega-billionaire Warren Buffett's company. PoliticAverse Oct 2021 #2
I don't get it. That rendering looks like the building has windows. grumpyduck Oct 2021 #3
The building has windows. The window opens on a common space that the bedrooms, WhiskeyGrinder Oct 2021 #6
It seems more like a prison for solitary confinement. madaboutharry Oct 2021 #4
The Fire Department will not allow construction of this death trap Submariner Oct 2021 #5
You can rest assured that if it is permitted, the FD approved it. maxsolomon Oct 2021 #11
This message was self-deleted by its author Carlitos Brigante Oct 2021 #30
That's What I Thought ProfessorGAC Oct 2021 #13
Limited entrances genxlib Oct 2021 #15
See My Reply To You - Below ProfessorGAC Oct 2021 #17
There are two entrances genxlib Oct 2021 #14
Agreed. Even if built, it would fail the occupancy certification. lindysalsagal Oct 2021 #35
Most American oligarchs are more interested in vanity projects, not actually helping people. Irish_Dem Oct 2021 #8
Maybe they need psychological testing for those assigned to the windowless rooms. hunter Oct 2021 #9
I object to the tripartite division. maxsolomon Oct 2021 #10
By tripartite division genxlib Oct 2021 #18
I would absolutely hate it FelineOverlord Oct 2021 #20
I guess I am on a weird place on the chart genxlib Oct 2021 #31
No, tripartite is the "Base/Middle/Top" of traditional building form maxsolomon Oct 2021 #23
I am going to be a dissenting voice here. genxlib Oct 2021 #12
Thanks ProfessorGAC Oct 2021 #16
I think referring to it as engineering behavior makes it sound more draconian than it really is. genxlib Oct 2021 #19
I Get All That ProfessorGAC Oct 2021 #21
Thanks, genxlib. How is it that people could just forget buildng codes? Hortensis Oct 2021 #29
Thank Christ we're "prone to drama". maxsolomon Oct 2021 #25
Architects are prone to drama greenjar_01 Oct 2021 #27
No offense meant. I love my Architect compatriots. genxlib Oct 2021 #33
None taken. maxsolomon Oct 2021 #38
I don't really have enough information to make a judgment on this. MineralMan Oct 2021 #22
If you want to see more genxlib Oct 2021 #34
Clicking the source takes you away from twit & to the SB Independent article. The Indy is good... Hekate Oct 2021 #37
Hot greenjar_01 Oct 2021 #24
LOL. maxsolomon Oct 2021 #26
Haaaaa! greenjar_01 Oct 2021 #28
little windowless prison cubes for sleeping. wording implies student would be out somewhere else Demovictory9 Oct 2021 #32
Suicide cubicles. hunter Oct 2021 #40
Only two doors? That thing is a goddam death trap. Hekate Oct 2021 #36
It has more than 2 exit doors. maxsolomon Oct 2021 #39
Okay then Hekate Oct 2021 #41
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»UC Santa Barbara planned ...»Reply #12