Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

okaawhatever

(9,565 posts)
5. The clickbait headline makes u believe the exact opposite
Wed Nov 17, 2021, 07:26 PM
Nov 2021

of what happened. Two decades ago he presided over a trial w/a black defendant. The jurors were 12 white and 1 black. There were 13 because one person becomes the alternate. When the clerk drew the name to see which juror would become the alternate the clerk pulled the only black juror to serve as the alternate. While the process was normal and fair, he realized the optics might make the defendant question the fairness of the process and decided to allow the defendant to pull the alternates name so optically it would seem much fairer.

Clearly this article is meant to create division and anger. Don’t let it. The judge might be a Grade A douchebag I don’t know, but his decision to allow Rittenhouse to pick the alternate is the same thing he’s done for 20 years, and the rationale was based on fairness.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

This message was self-deleted by its author Claustrum Nov 2021 #1
I think you completely missed what happened. Hoyt Nov 2021 #2
The clickbait headline makes u believe the exact opposite okaawhatever Nov 2021 #5
yo - I think it is his wording that is at issue. consider_this Nov 2021 #15
again, the judge might be a total douche stopdiggin Nov 2021 #18
This judge is mentally ill. ratchiweenie Nov 2021 #3
He is obviously senile, stupid, and shitty. Another one to go rot in hell. JanMichael Nov 2021 #4
AND HE'S THE OLDEST JUDGE ON THE BENCH IN WISCONSIN......he needs to go, AND NOW. a kennedy Nov 2021 #6
He's up for re-election in 2026. I doubt he'll be re-elected jimfields33 Nov 2021 #11
This message was self-deleted by its author a kennedy Nov 2021 #8
Judge Schroeder is like the red pill the conspiracy theorists talk about, or, Here America ShazamIam Nov 2021 #7
Why is he concerned about the optics of fairness vis-a-vis the defendant and not vis-a-vis the RockRaven Nov 2021 #9
Fuck that judge Blue Owl Nov 2021 #10
Why was it determined when it was time for the jury to deliberate? LiberalFighter Nov 2021 #12
18 jurors were selected and sat through trial. THEN, 6 were eliminated. My guess, to keep em engaged Hoyt Nov 2021 #13
It's to assure that all jurors are paying attention xmas74 Nov 2021 #16
He don't see his own optics!1 UTUSN Nov 2021 #14
+1 uponit7771 Nov 2021 #20
Want to do some about the Judge in the Rittenhouse trial, file a complaint. LetMyPeopleVote Nov 2021 #17
The judge is past his sell-by date. TomSlick Nov 2021 #19
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"Optics" of Rittenhouse j...»Reply #5