General Discussion

Sympthsical

(10,829 posts)

33. That isn't evidence of the claim

Sat Nov 20, 2021, 02:26 AM

Nov 2021

When the prosecution violated the 5th and 6th Amendments in addition to trying to sneak in evidence ruled inadmissible, those were three huge honking reasons the judge could've used to fling the whole case out the window.

He didn't.

When the prosecution wanted to submit blurry drone footage that their entire case then rested upon after their witnesses exploded in their face, the judge allowed it despite lengthy and strenuous objections by the defense. Had the drone footage enhancement been disallowed, the prosecution would've had no case whatsoever.

I have reasons - strong ones, I think - to believe the judge was not biased during this trial.

I have yet to see very convincing ones in the other direction.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

43 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

So how long befor Judge Bruce Schroeder is signing a deal with Fox? [View all] stevebreeze Nov 2021 OP

The Judge has run twice as a Democrat (once kelly1mm Nov 2021 #1

That's obviously a lie iemanja Nov 2021 #2

It's not a lie. But it also occurred forty years ago. And thus irrelevant. onenote Nov 2021 #4

Is there anything in how he ran that trial that says iemanja Nov 2021 #5

He has a long history of being pro-defendant's rights Sympthsical Nov 2021 #11

He wouldn't let the lawyers refer to the victims as victims. iemanja Nov 2021 #13

Does that change the fact that he ran as a Democrat kelly1mm Nov 2021 #15

He CLAIMED to be a Democrat iemanja Nov 2021 #19

Both President Obama and President Biden kelly1mm Nov 2021 #22

Please provide a link where the Judge was on Fox kelly1mm Nov 2021 #25

Forty years ago though. Reagan started off as a Democrat too. brush Nov 2021 #21

He has run in two partisan races, both as a Democrat kelly1mm Nov 2021 #23

Yes, he does it in all of his trials. Sympthsical Nov 2021 #18

well, that's bizarre iemanja Nov 2021 #20

There are other words easily used Sympthsical Nov 2021 #24

Some of those fair guys are long ball hitters. Tomconroy Nov 2021 #31

It's standard Zeitghost Nov 2021 #29

Not so.... Meowmee Nov 2021 #27

I'd read that Sympthsical Nov 2021 #28

He was biased in favor of this defendant Meowmee Nov 2021 #30

That isn't evidence of the claim Sympthsical Nov 2021 #33

Iyo Meowmee Nov 2021 #35

You just keep asserting this bias without evidence Sympthsical Nov 2021 #36

You haven't provided evidence Meowmee Nov 2021 #38

Maybe you should google his wilkipedia entry. kelly1mm Nov 2021 #7

I'm supposed to apologize for calling the judge a liar? iemanja Nov 2021 #8

Yes. When presented with facts that contradict kelly1mm Nov 2021 #9

I do not aplogize iemanja Nov 2021 #12

Ok, you do you! You asserted it was a lie kelly1mm Nov 2021 #14

No, I did not iemanja Nov 2021 #16

Post removed Post removed Nov 2021 #32

Post removed Post removed Nov 2021 #39

Ok, lets break this down and 'assume' he lied kelly1mm Nov 2021 #17

Jesus, it's like frickin' Q-Anon groupies. Dr. Strange Nov 2021 #43

Please provide a link where the Judge was on kelly1mm Nov 2021 #26

I too am not convinced Schroeder was unfair. He was originally appointed by Dem governor. Hoyt Nov 2021 #3

He's been on that bench since 1984! The position is non-partisan. LeftInTX Nov 2021 #6

True. I read he has never had an opponent at the polls Deuxcents Nov 2021 #10

I live in what was once a very Republican area and stevebreeze Nov 2021 #41

The judge is an old white Dixiecrat radius777 Nov 2021 #34

Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2021 #40

Schroeder could be the next Charles Krauthammer jcmaine72 Nov 2021 #37

Right after he gives Rittenhouse an Expert Marksman medal, and a box of .223 ammo to go with it. Paladin Nov 2021 #42