Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

stevebreeze

(1,882 posts)
41. I live in what was once a very Republican area and
Sat Nov 20, 2021, 02:09 PM
Nov 2021

There are many here who have rune as an "R" that are very Democratic leaning.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The Judge has run twice as a Democrat (once kelly1mm Nov 2021 #1
That's obviously a lie iemanja Nov 2021 #2
It's not a lie. But it also occurred forty years ago. And thus irrelevant. onenote Nov 2021 #4
Is there anything in how he ran that trial that says iemanja Nov 2021 #5
He has a long history of being pro-defendant's rights Sympthsical Nov 2021 #11
He wouldn't let the lawyers refer to the victims as victims. iemanja Nov 2021 #13
Does that change the fact that he ran as a Democrat kelly1mm Nov 2021 #15
He CLAIMED to be a Democrat iemanja Nov 2021 #19
Both President Obama and President Biden kelly1mm Nov 2021 #22
Please provide a link where the Judge was on Fox kelly1mm Nov 2021 #25
Forty years ago though. Reagan started off as a Democrat too. brush Nov 2021 #21
He has run in two partisan races, both as a Democrat kelly1mm Nov 2021 #23
Yes, he does it in all of his trials. Sympthsical Nov 2021 #18
well, that's bizarre iemanja Nov 2021 #20
There are other words easily used Sympthsical Nov 2021 #24
Some of those fair guys are long ball hitters. Tomconroy Nov 2021 #31
It's standard Zeitghost Nov 2021 #29
Not so.... Meowmee Nov 2021 #27
I'd read that Sympthsical Nov 2021 #28
He was biased in favor of this defendant Meowmee Nov 2021 #30
That isn't evidence of the claim Sympthsical Nov 2021 #33
Iyo Meowmee Nov 2021 #35
You just keep asserting this bias without evidence Sympthsical Nov 2021 #36
You haven't provided evidence Meowmee Nov 2021 #38
Maybe you should google his wilkipedia entry. kelly1mm Nov 2021 #7
I'm supposed to apologize for calling the judge a liar? iemanja Nov 2021 #8
Yes. When presented with facts that contradict kelly1mm Nov 2021 #9
I do not aplogize iemanja Nov 2021 #12
Ok, you do you! You asserted it was a lie kelly1mm Nov 2021 #14
No, I did not iemanja Nov 2021 #16
Post removed Post removed Nov 2021 #32
Post removed Post removed Nov 2021 #39
Ok, lets break this down and 'assume' he lied kelly1mm Nov 2021 #17
Jesus, it's like frickin' Q-Anon groupies. Dr. Strange Nov 2021 #43
Please provide a link where the Judge was on kelly1mm Nov 2021 #26
I too am not convinced Schroeder was unfair. He was originally appointed by Dem governor. Hoyt Nov 2021 #3
He's been on that bench since 1984! The position is non-partisan. LeftInTX Nov 2021 #6
True. I read he has never had an opponent at the polls Deuxcents Nov 2021 #10
I live in what was once a very Republican area and stevebreeze Nov 2021 #41
The judge is an old white Dixiecrat radius777 Nov 2021 #34
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2021 #40
Schroeder could be the next Charles Krauthammer jcmaine72 Nov 2021 #37
Right after he gives Rittenhouse an Expert Marksman medal, and a box of .223 ammo to go with it. Paladin Nov 2021 #42
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»So how long befor Judge B...»Reply #41