Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Armed Father-Daughter Duo Protect Anti-Rittenhouse Protesters [View all]Withywindle
(9,989 posts)85. My feelings exactly.
I have mixed feelings. I wish there far far fewer guns, not more - but if there must be guns, I don't think it's right that racist RW fascist nuts should be the only ones who have them. I'm not going to tell people of the groups they target the most that they shouldn't be able to defend themselves.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
87 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
That's your right. People should respect the right of others to form opinions.
WarGamer
Nov 2021
#50
What concerns me is someone is gonna feel "threatened" and start shooting claiming...
mitch96
Nov 2021
#3
She is an untrained 16 year old walking around with a semi-automatic assault rifle
bottomofthehill
Nov 2021
#23
At her next birthday, she can enlist in the army and carry a fully automatic rifle
Azathoth
Nov 2021
#77
There is a reason Uncle Sam does not take 16 year olds and only 17 year olds who have graduated
bottomofthehill
Nov 2021
#87
This is going to be a bit long, gonna put a little effort into all that lernin stuff you speak of
bottomofthehill
Nov 2021
#64
Nowhere in the quoted text of the bill is the term "assault rifle" used.
Dial H For Hero
Nov 2021
#67
seriously, you are kidding me right, I cant call it an assault big bird. its clearly defined....
bottomofthehill
Nov 2021
#75
It's a rifle. It's a semiautomatic rifle. It's an assault weapon. It's not an assault rifle.
Dial H For Hero
Nov 2021
#76
Ok, your are right, in my opinion they are not carrying rifles defined as assault weapons
bottomofthehill
Nov 2021
#79
Actually, they are carrying rifles which have been defined as assault weapons.
Dial H For Hero
Nov 2021
#81
I'm not crazy about this at all, but I do get some small bit of satisfaction...
Silent3
Nov 2021
#31
If you think the RW is not, on balance, far more armed, I have a great deal on a bridge for you.
Celerity
Nov 2021
#82