General Discussion

Effete Snob

(8,387 posts)

19. Recanting?

Thu Dec 9, 2021, 04:54 PM

Dec 2021

What have they recanted?

As noted in the OP, previously Jane said Maxwell was not directly involved in sexual abuse and now Jane is saying she was involved.

That's not "recanting".

Why would Epstein's lawyers and unidentified "goons" be pressuring the witness to further implicate Maxwell, and how is that "recanting" the prior testimony?

A witness is said to "recant" their prior testimony when they withdraw a prior incriminating allegation, not when they ADD to it.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

20 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

WOW: Maxwell Defense [View all] WHITT Dec 2021 OP

"and there's now a sizable 'Epstein Compensation Fund'" Effete Snob Dec 2021 #1

I Think WHITT Dec 2021 #5

"Is she unaware that when one gives a statement to the FBI..." Effete Snob Dec 2021 #7

Virginia Giuffre has been caught misrepresenting as well, claiming at one point she was 15 when she Hugh_Lebowski Dec 2021 #2

I don't doubt that a lot of bad has happened but when you are chowder66 Dec 2021 #3

The defense, in this case probably a very well paid defense, always tries to make the empedocles Dec 2021 #8

An article in Vanity Fair said the same thing but that doesn't Tomconroy Dec 2021 #4

Indeed WHITT Dec 2021 #6

The OP is a transcript from MSNBC Effete Snob Dec 2021 #14

Maybe Daytime WHITT Dec 2021 #15

Considering the intimidation Karma13612 Dec 2021 #9

The Defense Team WHITT Dec 2021 #10

Interesting, Karma13612 Dec 2021 #11

Good Question WHITT Dec 2021 #12

Witness tampering is a federal crime Effete Snob Dec 2021 #13

I have no idea, but I think it's odd Karma13612 Dec 2021 #17

Recanting? Effete Snob Dec 2021 #19

Update WHITT Dec 2021 #16

I need to follow the news back home more. DFW Dec 2021 #18

She'll throw what she needs to at the wall. Torchlight Dec 2021 #20