Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(11,101 posts)

8. It's simple. At this point they think Mourdock can still win. They think Akin can't.

Wed Oct 24, 2012, 12:26 PM

Oct 2012

The calculation begins and ends there.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I don't understand why Romney would double down on this [View all] gabeana Oct 2012 OP

K&R tk2kewl Oct 2012 #1

He wants the militant anti-choice vote. madaboutharry Oct 2012 #2

He can have it. The evangelical south is already his. democrat_patriot Oct 2012 #4

Nobody outside their bubble has yet Flashmann Oct 2012 #3

Romnesia ProSense Oct 2012 #5

Willard is rich. He is privileged, he hates being corrected rustydog Oct 2012 #6

Sheer political calculation. But I think that since Mittens stands by TwilightGardener Oct 2012 #7

Correct (I think) WinTwins Oct 2012 #11

Because the GOP does not consider women human ProfessionalLeftist Oct 2012 #10