Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Walleye

(44,312 posts)
25. It's different from doing something that will make a particular stock go up because you own it.
Sun Jan 9, 2022, 08:09 PM
Jan 2022

Nobody knows what stocks are in their retirement funds. The point is not to show favoritism. I think most people want to see the stock market go up, they just don’t want to see corruption

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

k & r n/t aocommunalpunch Jan 2022 #1
What?! No. I was planning to marry a congressperson leftstreet Jan 2022 #2
That has no chance of passing. BlueTsunami2018 Jan 2022 #3
Yep, it's the reason many of them are there. Mr.Bill Jan 2022 #6
Feeding at the federal trough is the only reason qpukes "serve" SheltieLover Jan 2022 #7
Many Dems will not support it either. roody Jan 2022 #63
What he's doing still has value. ShazzieB Jan 2022 #40
Beyond the stock market DENVERPOPS Jan 2022 #47
Nice. Though it's not a loophole, it's a feature, Alexander Of Assyria Jan 2022 #4
Good on you, Jon wendyb-NC Jan 2022 #5
K&R! SheltieLover Jan 2022 #8
I think Joe Biden never owned stock the whole time he was in the Senate. He got by OK Walleye Jan 2022 #9
While Biden does not have "direct ownership" of a stock or bond, he has paid money into JohnSJ Jan 2022 #12
I think that's different, it doesn't really present a conflict of interest Walleye Jan 2022 #13
I agree JohnSJ Jan 2022 #14
How is it different? former9thward Jan 2022 #17
Do you have a retirement fund? littlemissmartypants Jan 2022 #18
Yes. former9thward Jan 2022 #22
If it's a 401K it is possible you are investing in stocks. nt littlemissmartypants Jan 2022 #37
No doubt. former9thward Jan 2022 #41
Judge not lest ye be judged? ❤ littlemissmartypants Jan 2022 #46
:) The point to make is that Biden has avoided personal stock Hortensis Jan 2022 #49
littlemissmartypants Jan 2022 #54
It's different from doing something that will make a particular stock go up because you own it. Walleye Jan 2022 #25
Correct Rebl2 Jan 2022 #27
Post removed Post removed Jan 2022 #28
I'm thinking like if you own stock in a coal company and vote against the green new deal. Walleye Jan 2022 #31
Please provide citations to research documenting this. spooky3 Jan 2022 #42
Not true at all. Scrivener7 Jan 2022 #43
Like what for instance?? Vote on what specifically?? paleotn Jan 2022 #45
You don't choose the stocks... druidity33 Jan 2022 #48
K&R spanone Jan 2022 #10
I was watching an interview of Larry Summers on Bloomberg saying that allowing members of JohnSJ Jan 2022 #11
Liz Warren introduced a similar bill at one time, & she's no millennial. tblue37 Jan 2022 #16
Exactly, and I don't believe Bernie Sanders is a millennial either JohnSJ Jan 2022 #19
She did and it passed which is why congress critters cannot own stocks. AndyS Jan 2022 #26
I know, it is not just a millennial thing. LisaM Jan 2022 #33
+1 Ponietz Jan 2022 #36
+++ JohnSJ Jan 2022 #38
I hope they make each Senator vote on this. Should be used to embarrass those who don't support mjvpi Jan 2022 #15
Sine this will first happen in the House, it may never get to the Senate. It will be interesting JohnSJ Jan 2022 #20
The bill will go nowhere. former9thward Jan 2022 #21
but if it does, please add coal and pharmaceuticals NCjack Jan 2022 #23
I wonder what Speaker Pelosi thinks about this. Celerity Jan 2022 #24
I have loads of respect for Nancy Pelosi, but on this issue I agree that she is so wrong. crickets Jan 2022 #30
+1 Laura PourMeADrink Jan 2022 #34
I support Nancy - but she's wrong on this one. harumph Jan 2022 #35
They should not be doing this. AngryOldDem Jan 2022 #44
Stocks Old Okie Jan 2022 #53
John Ossof is right about this issue, and it needs more push from constituents. crickets Jan 2022 #29
That's an excellent link... druidity33 Jan 2022 #50
Thank you! BeckyDem Jan 2022 #52
Thanks. nt tblue37 Jan 2022 #56
Might be of interest... doughb Jan 2022 #57
Wow. Great find. nt crickets Jan 2022 #59
That is the part of his platform that I was most excited about ecstatic Jan 2022 #66
Gee, why hasnt this happened before 2022??? oldsoftie Jan 2022 #32
It has. Someone mentioned Elizabeth Warren introduced something like this previously, but it didn't JohnSJ Jan 2022 #39
Hooray for Jon Ossoff............. marieo1 Jan 2022 #51
This has always bothered me. Prospero1 Jan 2022 #55
Also need a law making it a criminal offense for them to be engaged in cstanleytech Jan 2022 #58
There are ETF's, mutual funds, arm's length advisors, and blind trusts for public servants bucolic_frolic Jan 2022 #60
Repubs been trading for decades azureblue Jan 2022 #61
Good! Proud of my Senator. And Pinback Jan 2022 #62
On its face it sounds reasonable but then when you think about it mahina Jan 2022 #64
This will never make the floor! Emile Jan 2022 #65
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Jon Ossoff will introduce...»Reply #25