Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

guillaumeb

(42,649 posts)
Tue Jan 11, 2022, 05:08 PM Jan 2022

Joe Manchin partial support thread: [View all]

Last edited Wed Jan 12, 2022, 12:37 PM - Edit history (1)

Manchin said,

“We need some good rules changes to make the place work better. But getting rid of the filibuster doesn’t make it work better,” Manchin told reporters."


He has previously expressed support for the idea of regulating what a filibuster is. Now, any GOP idiot can claim that he/she is filibustering, with no requirement for actual talking and no requirement to talk on topic.

Requiring that members be in the Chamber, talking directly on the topic, would greatly reduce the likelihood of these sham filibusters.

I am not arguing that the filibuster serves democracy, and the Senate has always been far from representative of the actual population, but given a 50-50 split, filibuster reform might be the only way to get to a 50-50 tie, with the VP casting the decisive vote.

And how inspirational would it be if the first biracial, female VP cast the deciding vote to sustain a democratic country?
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Joe Manchin partial suppo...