Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I demand an apology! [View all]Beastly Boy
(13,283 posts)50. In the long run, I don't care about Garland. I am defending the rule of law.
Garland is merely a convenient figurehead who is being pissed on by ignoramuses demanding instant gratification without any knowledge of due process of law.
And no one should apologize for welcoming indictments against random fuckwad who conspire to commit sedition against the United States.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
72 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
This has always been the concern. Republican administration are never held accountable
CentralMass
Jan 2022
#40
In the long run, I don't care about Garland. I am defending the rule of law.
Beastly Boy
Jan 2022
#50
Really!! I want to see this!! I'm going to go out there and search for it on DU immediately
SWBTATTReg
Jan 2022
#3
Are you saying that DUers don't care if conspirators and seditionists are being chareged if they
Beastly Boy
Jan 2022
#18
At least 2 of them on the charging document were listed as "body guards" for Roger Stone
BumRushDaShow
Jan 2022
#21
If I don't get the apologies I so deserve? Gee, the thought of people who pledged to
Beastly Boy
Jan 2022
#25
Naw, not yet ... these are still low hanging fruit. We'll see, bought himself some time no doubt
uponit7771
Jan 2022
#24
This is false, these people are nobody's in the end. They never held any power or affluence
uponit7771
Jan 2022
#32
So people who conspire to incite rebellion only count if they are powerful or affluent?
Beastly Boy
Jan 2022
#35
No, but you know this and are talking around the fact that the people with power and affluence
uponit7771
Jan 2022
#36
Yes, I know this. And I am not talking around the issue. I am talking about a completely different
Beastly Boy
Jan 2022
#39
You know very well critics of Garland want him to move on prominent Trump admin officials...
Act_of_Reparation
Jan 2022
#44
I'm in. At this point Garland is damned if he's thorough and damned if he's expedient.
LakeArenal
Jan 2022
#55
I was so certain that the culprits themselves would have come clean with their profuse apologies,
Beastly Boy
Jan 2022
#69
"simply had no understanding of the original goals and the original outrage." 👈🏾👈🏾👈🏾
uponit7771
Jan 2022
#30
While many here are saying these people are "low hanging fruit" or not important,
panader0
Jan 2022
#63
People here miss the point when told why low hanging fruit case building and sentencing are
ancianita
Jan 2022
#72