General Discussion

SonofBen

(45 posts)

5. "Mueller declined, citing insufficient evidence"

Sat Feb 12, 2022, 01:15 PM

Feb 2022

Last edited Sat Feb 12, 2022, 01:46 PM - Edit history (1)

So, if you don't have the evidence how do you charge a crime?

Maybe Mueller should have charged and hoped to dazzle a judge and jury with bullshit?

I'm really not sure what this "revelation" is supposed to prove.

Unless it just further proves Mueller's incompetence which i thought was fairly evident already.

On edit:
Just noticed this earth shaking "revelation" is from Jason Leoplod (sic) of "24 business hours" fame.

All i need to know.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Mueller Declined To Charge Donald Trump Jr. And Roger Stone With Computer Crimes [View all] L. Coyote Feb 2022 OP

Is there a term like "Fitzmas" for Mueller? Hoyt Feb 2022 #1

Rosensteined? L. Coyote Feb 2022 #2

Wasn't the rule at the time and probably still a sitting president could not be indicted? Demsrule86 Feb 2022 #10

Total waste Timewas Feb 2022 #3

The investigation convicted numerous people. You wanted them to got off scott free? L. Coyote Feb 2022 #4

NOT what I said Timewas Feb 2022 #6

Now you're saying convicting criminals is "attempt to allow criminals (politicians) to break laws" L. Coyote Feb 2022 #8

Yup Timewas Feb 2022 #9

"Mueller declined, citing insufficient evidence" SonofBen Feb 2022 #5

Agreed Timewas Feb 2022 #7

This message was self-deleted by its author Seinan Sensei Mar 2022 #11