Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Sussman responds to Durham's nonsense [View all]
Quite the read.
Unfortunately, the Special Counsel has done more than simply file a document
identifying potential conflicts of interest. Rather, the Special Counsel has again made a filing in
this case that unnecessarily includes prejudicial—and false—allegations that are irrelevant to his
Motion and to the charged offense, and are plainly intended to politicize this case, inflame media
coverage, and taint the jury pool.
identifying potential conflicts of interest. Rather, the Special Counsel has again made a filing in
this case that unnecessarily includes prejudicial—and false—allegations that are irrelevant to his
Motion and to the charged offense, and are plainly intended to politicize this case, inflame media
coverage, and taint the jury pool.
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.235638/gov.uscourts.dcd.235638.37.0_1.pdf
10 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
= new reply since forum marked as read