Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Elwood P Dowd

(11,453 posts)

3. What about this from Peter Baker?

Reply to highplainsdem (Original post)

Thu Feb 24, 2022, 01:52 AM

Feb 2022

Peter Baker
@peterbakernyt
·
2h
Reminder: Russia signed a binding international agreement in 1994 committing "to respect the independence and sovereignty and the existing borders of Ukraine” and “to refrain from the threat or use of force” against the country.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

29 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

MSNBC's Hayes Brown on possible Ukraine effort to oust Russia from UN Security Council [View all] highplainsdem Feb 2022 OP

Yes. That's exactly what I understood him to be arguing. WheelWalker Feb 2022 #1

Why is this even a question ? kacekwl Feb 2022 #2

What about this from Peter Baker? Elwood P Dowd Feb 2022 #3

Ya think? cilla4progress Feb 2022 #4

That would be Mar-a-largo. SergeStorms Feb 2022 #18

For this thread LetMyPeopleVote Feb 2022 #5

Straight to HELL Cha Feb 2022 #15

HMMMMMMMM! malaise Feb 2022 #28

Sounds like a very legitimate argument.... Sogo Feb 2022 #6

I heard this when he said such and admit I was intrigued. herding cats Feb 2022 #7

Yeah EndlessWire Feb 2022 #8

Sounds good to me The Revolution Feb 2022 #9

In which case, the time to litigate this was (counts...) 30 years ago. brooklynite Feb 2022 #23

They have no right to a seat. AngryOldDem Feb 2022 #10

China would simply veto qazplm135 Feb 2022 #11

They'd have to think about that very carefully. SergeStorms Feb 2022 #19

They want Taiwan qazplm135 Feb 2022 #20

We'll see. SergeStorms Feb 2022 #21

They ain't attacking Russia today qazplm135 Feb 2022 #22

We went from discussing a possible veto.... SergeStorms Feb 2022 #24

Quit being super literal qazplm135 Feb 2022 #27

You are correct n/t malaise Feb 2022 #29

Well, well. Who knew? Hekate Feb 2022 #12

Here's the ambassador citing the part of the charter that deals Cha Feb 2022 #13

It needs to be done blue-wave Feb 2022 #14

That would never happen left-of-center2012 Feb 2022 #16

That is an interesting argument. The USSR no longer exists. nvme Feb 2022 #17

hmmmm uponit7771 Feb 2022 #25

In normal times, this argument wouldn't fly. crickets Feb 2022 #26