General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The September Surprise: Blowback from Benghazi threatens Obama’s Lead. [View all]justiceischeap
(14,040 posts)I don't see a smoking gun. All your sources are either Murdoch owned entities (with the exception of Tapper & ABC and both can be argued to have an agenda) or are conservative hacks that have their own agenda. Like Clare Lopez, an Anti-Islam conservative activist hack, who like the Bush admin, would say anything to further her agenda (she wants a war with Iran in the worst way).
Your call for brutal candor is ridiculous. What don't you "Benghazi truther's" get about national security? Yes, please, let's tell all our secrets to the world so they can harm us. It doesn't take much to see that if the CIA is involved, there are things going on we shouldn't be talking about in the name of national security? Or do you distrust the Obama administration so much that you think they are doing the same sorts of things the Bush admin did? Because that's what this basically comes down to. President Obama isn't "one of us", he's a Muslim, he is covering up the truth about Benghazi because he's secretly selling arms to Al Qaeda (you are aware that these sources you're quoting are floating that story too, right?).
I will wait for the actual investigation to take place and for the results of that to be released before I start making assumptions based on ginned up coverage right before the election, thanks very much. I mean, the same folks that are pushing this story were and are convinced thatEric Holder was doing something nefarious with Fast & Furious. Now that the investigation has been completed and Holder has been cleared of wrong-doing, these same "truther's" are calling cover-up of that as well. It's all racially motivated and it shouldn't be here on DU.