Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Saboburns

(2,807 posts)
29. And none of that prohibits him from Constitutionally protected religious activity.
Mon Apr 25, 2022, 11:58 AM
Apr 2022

See, here in America we don't prohibit anyone from praying. Anywhere or anytime.

What we do is not allow is any government entity making any prayer school sanctioned or mandatory for anybody. That coach can pray on the 50-yard line, what he can't do is pressure, or coerce, or make any players or students join in.

And that's the crux of this case.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

There are thousands of churches and they are tax-free. They still have to force prayers on children Walleye Apr 2022 #1
You can prayer in school just keep it to yourself Marthe48 Apr 2022 #24
They think God orders them to shove it down our throats Walleye Apr 2022 #25
We didn't have teacher led praying Marthe48 Apr 2022 #31
They'll change their mind when other religions start doing the same uponit7771 Apr 2022 #2
First, they should ponder Matthew 6: 16-18. GoCubsGo Apr 2022 #3
It's perfectly legal for a coach to pray on the 50-yard line. Saboburns Apr 2022 #4
He is an adult in a position of authority. He decides who makes Phoenix61 Apr 2022 #17
And none of that prohibits him from Constitutionally protected religious activity. Saboburns Apr 2022 #29
None of that changes what I said. Phoenix61 Apr 2022 #30
He stopped praying with the students forthemiddle Apr 2022 #32
One player did complain. Phoenix61 Apr 2022 #34
Thanks, I missed that forthemiddle Apr 2022 #37
It's also about a public school and using that platform to support religion. Cuthbert Allgood Apr 2022 #40
Who will protect and secure FraDon Apr 2022 #5
The best explanation of it all (and it's NOT Bill Maher): DFW Apr 2022 #18
Ahh, you beat me to it. From the Washington Post: mahatmakanejeeves Apr 2022 #6
'living their faith' doesn't have to be made into a spectacle rurallib Apr 2022 #9
Jesus would be horrified. GoCubsGo Apr 2022 #10
Thank you for the additional info. n/t sl8 Apr 2022 #26
I'll be honest. I learned the Lords Prayer from high school football underpants Apr 2022 #7
The fact that you felt coerced (and who wouldn't have felt that way?) is the Nay Apr 2022 #14
They've baked their prayers into cakes, into healthcare plans, now the 50 yard line?? bucolic_frolic Apr 2022 #8
Looks like it will come down to Justice Barret FBaggins Apr 2022 #11
Is that really the right location? How about the 5 yard line? Or the end zone? milestogo Apr 2022 #12
It must not be important to Judge Ginni or it would be... Hugin Apr 2022 #13
My God, do they kneel ? rickford66 Apr 2022 #15
Of course. They kneel and hold hands. It's considered team building. haele Apr 2022 #20
So why the fuss about Kaepernick kneeling ? rickford66 Apr 2022 #21
Kaepernick kneeling was not religious, but for "respect". haele Apr 2022 #22
these cases are not about the exercise of religion MissMillie Apr 2022 #16
Jeepers Karma13612 Apr 2022 #19
What the Court can't possibly determine DFW Apr 2022 #23
Separation of church and state - it's a fucking no-brainer Novara Apr 2022 #27
I've heard this saying; Religon is like a penis. It's okay to have one and it's okay to be Hotler Apr 2022 #28
A waste of tax payers money. Folks have been doing that for years now praying at the 50 rockfordfile Apr 2022 #33
A Catholic School can do it 24/7. maxsolomon Apr 2022 #35
+1 moondust Apr 2022 #38
Reread this story, replacing "praying" with "masturbating". Midnight Writer Apr 2022 #36
Who is it really who wants to indoctrinate children? Hmmmmmm, Who could it be? MagickMuffin Apr 2022 #39
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Supreme Court ponders...»Reply #29