Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(59,343 posts)

6. That's next.

Mon May 2, 2022, 09:26 PM

May 2022

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

18 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

What happens to Griswold v. Connecticut? [View all] Frasier Balzov May 2022 OP

Nothing happens to Griswold, Loving, Lawrence, or Obergefell. elleng May 2022 #1

Yet. Salviati May 2022 #4

Not automatically, of course. Frasier Balzov May 2022 #5

I believe two were specifically cited in the opinion MoonlitKnight May 2022 #7

You believe this, on what basis? elleng May 2022 #8

An excerpt I read MoonlitKnight May 2022 #9

Link to draft opinion available? elleng May 2022 #11

By all means! Frasier Balzov May 2022 #14

thanks elleng May 2022 #16

Here Arazi May 2022 #15

Pages 31 and 32 MoonlitKnight May 2022 #17

I wouldn't be too sure. TwilightZone May 2022 #12

This absolutely opens the door for challenges on all of those. Cuthbert Allgood May 2022 #13

Life in the 1950's was NOT hunky dory. ProudMNDemocrat May 2022 #2

Yes. Soon it will be 1825 except for all the surveillance technology bucolic_frolic May 2022 #3

That's next. Scrivener7 May 2022 #6

Yes iemanja May 2022 #18