Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

herding cats

(20,054 posts)
19. +1
Tue May 3, 2022, 05:17 PM
May 2022

I am believer that's next up.

Recall this from 2020?

Justices Thomas, Alito Blast Supreme Court Decision On Same-Sex Marriage Rights

Supreme Court Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito issued a broadside against the high court's 2015 same-sex marriage decision on Monday when the court declined to hear a case brought by a former Kentucky county clerk who refused to issue a marriage license for such couples.

The two justices agreed with the decision not to hear the case but used the occasion to take a legal baseball bat to the court's 2015 decision Obergefell v. Hodges, which declared that same-sex couples have a constitutional right to marry under the 14th Amendment guarantee to equal protection of the law.

Writing for himself and Alito, Thomas said that the court's decision "enables courts and governments to brand religious adherents who believe that marriage is between one man and one woman as bigots, making their religious liberty concerns that much easier to dismiss."

His words came in a case brought by Kim Davis, a former county clerk in Kentucky, who in the aftermath of the same-sex marriage decision refused to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples and was sued.

"Davis may have been one of the first victims of this court's cavalier treatment of religion in its Obergefell decision," Thomas and Alito wrote. But they agreed that the court properly decided not to take up Davis' case because, they said, it does not "cleanly" present the issues in the court's 5-4 decision five years ago.

Nevertheless, they said, the case "provides a stark reminder" of the consequences of the same-sex marriage decision. By choosing to endorse "a novel constitutional right over the religious liberty interests explicitly protected in the First Amendment, and by doing so undemocratically, the court has created a problem that only it can fix," they said. "Until then, Obergefell will continue to have ruinous consequences for religious liberty."

The fact that Thomas and Alito chose this moment to issue their blast provoked dismay in the LGBT community and elsewhere.
https://www.npr.org/2020/10/05/920416357/justices-thomas-alito-blast-supreme-court-decision-on-gay-marriage-rights

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Since it is nearly impossible for SCOTUS to directly feel any heat rurallib May 2022 #1
I'm afraid you're right. StarryNite May 2022 #3
yeah, no way this shit stops here. mopinko May 2022 #4
Don't forget Obergefell soldierant May 2022 #12
Obergefell for sure rurallib May 2022 #16
+1 herding cats May 2022 #19
My Democratic Governor soldierant May 2022 #27
K&R StarryNite May 2022 #2
Remember this? Sen. Joe Manchin announces he'll vote for Brett Kavanaugh Autumn May 2022 #5
Manchin. SergeStorms May 2022 #11
Yeah, he helped get all of MF45's SCROTUS appointments confirmed. FoxNewsSucks May 2022 #13
Fuck ManChin and his millions$$. NoMoreRepugs May 2022 #24
"I believe he will rule in a manner consistent with our Constitution." XacerbatedDem May 2022 #17
I remember. mcar May 2022 #6
I'll never forget. Some of them are unable to understand what Hortensis May 2022 #8
My cousin's twenty-something gay son called her a "c#$t" LuvLoogie May 2022 #9
Your parents sound like mine were mcar May 2022 #15
Yup. I'll take the ESTABLISHMENT any day over the millionare performance artists Budi May 2022 #18
I am with her all the way. 2naSalit May 2022 #7
This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music May 2022 #31
Republicans are all about breaking everything in America IronLionZion May 2022 #10
Proud to say I voted for her, and worked hard for her. calimary May 2022 #14
You meant Neil Gorsuch. herding cats May 2022 #20
Yes. Correct. I couldn't think of his name at the moment. calimary May 2022 #26
This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music May 2022 #32
Don't forget the McConnell/Garland bullshit world wide wally May 2022 #21
I don't entirely disagree Zeitghost May 2022 #28
The abortion vote they are acting on probably would have gone 5-4 in the opposite direction world wide wally May 2022 #29
Agreed Zeitghost May 2022 #30
Prophetic uponit7771 May 2022 #22
All you Democrats remember the ones that said this, "Oh, I just can't vote for Hillary." spike jones May 2022 #23
Because it was so fun to hate the fictional Satan Hillary. betsuni May 2022 #25
This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music May 2022 #33
I went to sleep llashram May 2022 #34
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Remember this? No? Why n...»Reply #19