This campaign ad! HOLY SHIT YES!

[Escurumbele]

23. Nope, sorry to differ on that idea but I have experience with what she is proposing.

This is what happens, there are people who have worked hard to have their primary and secondary homes, none of those are mansions, they are nice middle class properties that have been earned with a lot of sweat. The second home may be unoccupied for most of the year because the family only goes there in the Summer, so during the Summer their primary home is unoccupied...Which one of these homes do you all think people should invade? And the word is "INVADE", not "OCCUPY". How is the criteria set for people to know which homes to invade?

I have seen this happen in other countries, and the results are not good. I would rather have the government set regulations to make sure property costs are kept at an acceptable level, that people start making more money to afford primary and secondary homes, if they so wish.

As I said, I have seen this idea come to reality in South American countries, lots of deaths, lots of shooting from people who want to protect their properties.

Someone please tell me what they think the criteria should be to justify someone invading someone else's property, please tell.