Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Just now, a tweet from J6 committee [View all]dchill
(42,660 posts)47. I'm unaware of the need for a source...
...for a C.T.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
97 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Apparently people ARE above the law. I dare anyone else to do the same as these pigs and watch what
onecaliberal
Jun 2022
#5
The justice department was packed with republicans during tfg's term & bush's term
questionseverything
Jun 2022
#8
garland's first task should have been to root out the ones who had burrowed in.
mopinko
Jun 2022
#53
Did you read the same report I did? Because there is no pressure, and some people
Scrivener7
Jun 2022
#49
How does Garland claim to be going after everyone at all levels associated with J6?
onecaliberal
Jun 2022
#12
wow..... i took the hopeful viewpoint that DOJ didn't indict because they had helped the Jan 6
Takket
Jun 2022
#13
If you feel that strongly, call your rep and demand they impeach Garland. Nt
Fiendish Thingy
Jun 2022
#30
Then obviously there are people on the J6 Committee that have no idea what is going on.
Autumn
Jun 2022
#56
I wondered about that... I guess it would be possible even without the J6 committee's knowledge...
liberalla
Jun 2022
#72
Thank goodness that J6 did not provide the interviews/evidence that DoJ was asking for.
Grasswire2
Jun 2022
#32
To all who are saying that this means they must be cooperating with the DOJ:
Scrivener7
Jun 2022
#51
This is crucial that the DOJ does it's freakin job. Who is blocking these arrests?
BSdetect
Jun 2022
#58
In these highest-of-profile cases, I'm sure the Attorney General has the last word on...
LudwigPastorius
Jun 2022
#61
How else can they fill a 24-hour news cycle? Personally, I'd welcome more comedy.
housecat
Jun 2022
#68
"...we find the decision to reward Mark Meadows and Dan Scavino for their continued attack on...
LudwigPastorius
Jun 2022
#60
The DOJ decision is beyond puzzling. It is detrimental to the truth and to upholding the law.
Lonestarblue
Jun 2022
#62
Boy, I had it all wrong. I thought that Meadows and Sciavino got off contempt of congress...
Frustratedlady
Jun 2022
#87
There are i's to dot and t's to cross. Serious people say this is needed. I believe them.
Lucky Luciano
Jun 2022
#88
I'll likely get crucified for this, but I'm going to give the DoJ the benefit of the doubt on this.
Celerity
Jun 2022
#81
Well, The January 6th Commission, Filled With Democrats, Is Not Giving Them The Benefit Of The Doubt
SoCalDavidS
Jun 2022
#84
DOJ is not doing their job. This is potentially the end of democracy if they can't indict those
Evolve Dammit
Jun 2022
#94