Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

THERE IS NO PROOF SHE IS THE SOURCE OF THE LEAK Novara Jun 2022 #1
We do not know at this point that "THERE IS NO PROOF" bucolic_frolic Jun 2022 #2
There is a difference between proof and evidence. padfun Jun 2022 #3
thus the point of investigation... There is no proof any specific clerk is the source, either. hlthe2b Jun 2022 #7
+1 yardwork Jun 2022 #8
+1 Ferrets are Cool Jun 2022 #15
this is not court, and mystal has a very good reputation. mopinko Jun 2022 #9
THERE IS NO PROOF THAT A YOUNG CLERK IS THE SOURCE OF THE LEAK dixiechiken1 Jun 2022 #17
So, true, plimsoll Jun 2022 #18
like llashram Jun 2022 #23
Sedition The Bopper Jun 2022 #28
Ginni is a GOP/ SC mascot. She will be protected at all costs. Irish_Dem Jun 2022 #4
I've begun to wonder if Clarence's primary qualification for his SC job was Ginni's GOP connections. tanyev Jun 2022 #10
Excellent point, it is certainly looking that way. Irish_Dem Jun 2022 #13
K&R spanone Jun 2022 #5
I am beyond sick and tired of these traitors getting away with their crimes Diamond_Dog Jun 2022 #6
Agree 100% BlueJac Jun 2022 #11
K&R Thanks for posting. n/t TeamProg Jun 2022 #12
"You shall not commit a perversion of justice;" Lev. 19:15 70sEraVet Jun 2022 #14
Nor do they follow the numerous exhortations in the Bible against lying. Lonestarblue Jun 2022 #16
Excellent billboard, print ad or possible video sanatanadharma Jun 2022 #19
Even if there is proof, neither Thomas is under SCOTUS jurisdiction. Just the clerks working there. ancianita Jun 2022 #20
Are we still on this conspiracy theory? Sympthsical Jun 2022 #21
possibly llashram Jun 2022 #25
you saw "piecing" llashram Jun 2022 #26
I stick with evidence and likelihood Sympthsical Jun 2022 #27
there will be llashram Jun 2022 #29
Ok, but an opinion has to be rooted in facts to count Sympthsical Jun 2022 #30
so you say llashram Jun 2022 #31
it seems obvious llashram Jun 2022 #22
Are the justices being investigated? Buckeyeblue Jun 2022 #24
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The SCOTUS Charade Of Inv...»Reply #12