Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

llashram

(6,269 posts)
23. like
Sun Jun 5, 2022, 11:10 AM
Jun 2022

Ginni huh... Take a good close look at this SC. Ginni is part of the 'big lie' crowd. Clarence is part of the fascist section of the Supreme Court. Slam dunk, you will see.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

THERE IS NO PROOF SHE IS THE SOURCE OF THE LEAK Novara Jun 2022 #1
We do not know at this point that "THERE IS NO PROOF" bucolic_frolic Jun 2022 #2
There is a difference between proof and evidence. padfun Jun 2022 #3
thus the point of investigation... There is no proof any specific clerk is the source, either. hlthe2b Jun 2022 #7
+1 yardwork Jun 2022 #8
+1 Ferrets are Cool Jun 2022 #15
this is not court, and mystal has a very good reputation. mopinko Jun 2022 #9
THERE IS NO PROOF THAT A YOUNG CLERK IS THE SOURCE OF THE LEAK dixiechiken1 Jun 2022 #17
So, true, plimsoll Jun 2022 #18
like llashram Jun 2022 #23
Sedition The Bopper Jun 2022 #28
Ginni is a GOP/ SC mascot. She will be protected at all costs. Irish_Dem Jun 2022 #4
I've begun to wonder if Clarence's primary qualification for his SC job was Ginni's GOP connections. tanyev Jun 2022 #10
Excellent point, it is certainly looking that way. Irish_Dem Jun 2022 #13
K&R spanone Jun 2022 #5
I am beyond sick and tired of these traitors getting away with their crimes Diamond_Dog Jun 2022 #6
Agree 100% BlueJac Jun 2022 #11
K&R Thanks for posting. n/t TeamProg Jun 2022 #12
"You shall not commit a perversion of justice;" Lev. 19:15 70sEraVet Jun 2022 #14
Nor do they follow the numerous exhortations in the Bible against lying. Lonestarblue Jun 2022 #16
Excellent billboard, print ad or possible video sanatanadharma Jun 2022 #19
Even if there is proof, neither Thomas is under SCOTUS jurisdiction. Just the clerks working there. ancianita Jun 2022 #20
Are we still on this conspiracy theory? Sympthsical Jun 2022 #21
possibly llashram Jun 2022 #25
you saw "piecing" llashram Jun 2022 #26
I stick with evidence and likelihood Sympthsical Jun 2022 #27
there will be llashram Jun 2022 #29
Ok, but an opinion has to be rooted in facts to count Sympthsical Jun 2022 #30
so you say llashram Jun 2022 #31
it seems obvious llashram Jun 2022 #22
Are the justices being investigated? Buckeyeblue Jun 2022 #24
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The SCOTUS Charade Of Inv...»Reply #23