General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: We need to consider Boudin's loss in California [View all]gldstwmn
(4,575 posts)But I will provide a link for you below. Meanwhile here is some further info from Mother Jones. Note that the Door Dash founder poured money into the recall effort most likely because Boudin went after him for wage theft.
For some low-level crimes, he began diverting more offenders to alternative programs like mental health and substance abuse treatment. He also promised not to pursue the death penalty or to prosecute juveniles as adults.
Meanwhile, Boudin did seek to prosecute powerful actors who often escape scrutiny: His office filed charges against police officers for excessive force, while also suing the food delivery service DoorDash for unfair labor practices.
His opponents, financed partly by a Republican billionaire and venture capitalists, argued that his policies made the city less safe. Its turned into Escape From New York, Gotham City-level chaos here, Jason Calacanis, an angel investor for Robinhood and Uber who supported the recall, said in 2021 on a podcast he co-hosts. The data does not support those claims: As I previously reported, overall crime is down in San Francisco, and the city has a relatively low homicide rate compared with other places of a similar size. Property crimes, which rose during the first year of the pandemic, are generally moving back toward more normal levels, with some exceptions like car thefts.
(snip)
Anytime someone is trying to change a system, theres resistance to it, the Vera Institutes Johnson says of Boudins critics. The district attorney has faced pushback not only from the citys police union, which described him during his 2019 campaign as the #1 choice of criminals and gang members, but also from Mayor London Breed, who has been openly critical of him in the media.
As numerous columnists and reporters have pointed out, theres no evidence that Boudin was responsible for shifting crime rates in San Francisco during the pandemic. Homicides, for example, spiked almost universally around the country during 2020, in red and blue states alike. Boudins office is also just one piece of a complicated legal system: The citys police department has been arresting far fewer people than it used to, with its lowest clearance rate in a decade.
https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2022/06/san-francisco-voters-just-ousted-their-reformist-district-attorney/
The San Francisco Police Departments crime clearance rates have dropped to its lowest level in a decade, spurring much lamentation at Wednesday nights Police Commission meeting.
A February letter of inquiry from District 9 Supervisor Hillary Ronen to Police Chief Bill Scott was extensively discussed at the meeting. That letter expressed concerns that a political rift between the SFPD and the DAs office was causing a deliberate work stoppage by the police.
Explanations from the chief of police and his colleague defending the department didnt appear to satisfy the three Board of Supervisors-appointed commissioners the only ones who spoke during Wednesday evenings agenda item. The three mayoral appointees on the commission sat silent.
Only 8.1 percent of reported crimes in 2021 led to an arrest. That is the lowest its been in the past 10 years, said acting president Cindy Elias, reading off the SFPDs low clearance rates for various crimes as compared to national averages. The current rate, she said, is unacceptable.
Ronens letter noted reports in the media, as well as instances when she and her staff had personally witnessed members of the SFPD tell constituents that there is no point in investigating crimes or arresting perpetrators because the District Attorney will not prosecute, a claim she called patently false.
Data shows that DA Chesa Boudins charging rates are actually higher than those of previous DAs.
https://missionlocal.org/2022/04/sfpd-rate-of-solving-crimes-already-well-below-national-average-gets-worse/