General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: We need to consider Boudin's loss in California [View all]gldstwmn
(4,575 posts)Their fight against Boudin is part of a broader tough-on-crime movement that has gained momentum during the pandemic. In Los Angeles, progressive District Attorney George Gascón faces a well-funded recall effort, too. Last year, so did multiple prosecutors in Virginia who campaigned on similar promises to make the legal system fairer for low-income people and people of color. In March, an Illinois lawmaker introduced a bill to recall reformist States Attorney Kim Foxx, accusing her of creating a crisis of confidence in the Cook County judicial system.
In all these places, people are using fear narratives to paint a picture that reform and safety are opposite, says Akhi Johnson, a former prosecutor who now works at the Vera Institute of Justice, a think tank that collaborates with progressive district attorneys. For instance, one anti-Boudin group in San Francisco wrote recently on its website that as car break-ins, burglaries, and overdoses reach a crisis level in San Francisco, Boudins refusal to hold serial offenders and drug dealers accountable is putting more of us at risk. Fearmongering like this can be persuasive: A few polls suggest that a majority of San Francisco voters (between 57 and 68 percent) now want to oust Boudin in the recall, including many Democrats. (One poll, commissioned by Boudins supporters, suggested that 48 percent of voters want to recall him.)
Boudins critics say they feel unsafe under his leadership. But the thing is, while the pandemic has undoubtedly heightened existing crises around homelessness, drug use, and mental health in San Francisco and elsewhere, crime rates are not spiraling out of control, and theres no evidence that Boudin or other DAs are responsible for the upticks that have occurred. In fact, academics who studied progressive prosecutors around the country found that their policies did not cause violence to rise. With less than two weeks until the votes are counted in San Francisco, heres a breakdown of the most relevant research about crime rates, progressive prosecutors, and the link (or lack thereof) between the two.
(snip)
These problems began long before Boudin took office, but for many San Francisco residents, it seems like theyve gotten worse in the last couple of years. According to local and national data, an overwhelming majority of San Franciscans, like a majority of Americans, believe crime rates have gone up. Some of them may be reacting to media reports about shootings or other acts of violence, says the Vera Institutes Johnson: The tragic incident sticks with them; the fear piece of it tends to latch on.
(snip)
What is new, however, is that cops appear to be making fewer arrests for these types of crimes than they used to. In fact, the police clearance rate in San Francisco has dropped to its lowest in a decade, at just 8.1 percent. Some officers say they see no point bringing a suspect to the station because they believe Boudin is unlikely to pursue the case. (Theyre wrongmore on that later.) Earlier this month, Boudin said his office had to go so far as renting a U-Haul to bust a boba shop that was accused of fencing stolen goods, after the police allegedly declined to help.
https://www.motherjones.com/crime-justice/2022/05/chesa-boudin-crime-rates-false-narratives-progressive-da-george-gascon-kim-foxx/