Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bigtree

(94,341 posts)
51. no, this is why
Thu Jun 9, 2022, 05:14 PM
Jun 2022
1-7.001 - Purpose

The Department of Justice (DOJ) Confidentiality and Media Contacts Policy (the Policy) applies to all DOJ personnel, including employees, contractors, detailees, and task force partners.

The Policy governs the protection and release of information that DOJ personnel obtain in the course of their work, and it balances four primary interests: (1) an individual’s right to a fair trial or adjudicative proceeding; (2) an individual’s interest in privacy; (3) the government’s ability to administer justice and promote public safety; and (4) the right of the public to have access to information about the Department of Justice.

The Policy provides internal guidance only and does not create any rights enforceable in law or otherwise. DOJ components may promulgate more specific policies, consistent with and subject to this Policy.


7.100 – General Need for Confidentiality

Much of DOJ’s work involves non-public, sensitive matters. Disseminating non-public, sensitive information about DOJ matters could violate federal laws, employee non-disclosure agreements, and individual privacy rights; put a witness or law enforcement officer in danger; jeopardize an investigation or case; prejudice the rights of a defendant; or unfairly damage the reputation of a person.

DOJ personnel should presume that non-public, sensitive information obtained in connection with work is protected from disclosure, except as needed to fulfill official duties of DOJ personnel, and as allowed by court order, statutory or regulatory prescription, or case law and rules governing criminal and civil discovery. Other than as necessary to fulfill DOJ official duties, disclosure of such information to anyone, including to family members, friends, or even colleagues, is prohibited and could lead to disciplinary action. Unauthorized disclosures of sensitive personal or proprietary information could lead to criminal prosecution or administrative action.


https://www.justice.gov/jm/jm-1-7000-media-relations#1-7.111

(nothing in there about exceptions for sharing information about their ongoing investigations and prosecutions with congressmen)

I used this symbol (/s) in the other post to indicate sarcasm.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Does Adam Schiff watch Law & Order? hamsterjill Jun 2022 #1
Yes. Those year-and-a-half long episodes of Law & Order must be on channels I don't get. Scrivener7 Jun 2022 #35
Who the hell is this Adam Schiff? Diablo del sol Jun 2022 #2
WTF!? Solomon Jun 2022 #24
Didn't think it was needed Diablo del sol Jun 2022 #48
No shit. Voltaire2 Jun 2022 #3
I sense FarPoint Jun 2022 #6
So you're saying Schiff is just trolling us? Scrivener7 Jun 2022 #36
Not trolling " us" FarPoint Jun 2022 #38
Do you hear yourself? Scrivener7 Jun 2022 #41
i'm worried that garland is going to run out the clock samsingh Jun 2022 #4
Far from it.... FarPoint Jun 2022 #7
Yes agingdem Jun 2022 #9
This is going to be a long-hot summer.... FarPoint Jun 2022 #39
a reckoning, a cleanse... agingdem Jun 2022 #42
i'll see it when i believe it samsingh Jun 2022 #47
Agreed. Baked Potato Jun 2022 #34
I think he is throwing bait to tRumpers... FarPoint Jun 2022 #5
Could be ... Novara Jun 2022 #14
I think it's more of a show of independence. GoCubsGo Jun 2022 #17
That's also a good point Novara Jun 2022 #20
great point... FarPoint Jun 2022 #30
5-D Chess! 867-5309. Jun 2022 #18
Wow. That's a positively Q-ish conclusion. Trust the plan, eh? Scrivener7 Jun 2022 #37
What does Adam Schiff know, he has no clue what's going on. Why does he hate Democrats? Autumn Jun 2022 #8
Would you like to expand upon that claim FarPoint Jun 2022 #10
I understood the sarcasm emoji to be that user's explanation. nt Gore1FL Jun 2022 #12
Would you like to look at my post? Autumn Jun 2022 #13
Good grief! hamsterjill Jun 2022 #25
Yea.... FarPoint Jun 2022 #32
Post removed Post removed Jun 2022 #31
he knows DOJ shares details and explanations about their investigations with individual congressmen bigtree Jun 2022 #22
That must be why he doesn't understand. Autumn Jun 2022 #50
no, this is why bigtree Jun 2022 #51
So why would a former prosecutor, one who has served as a U.S. representative since 2001 Autumn Jun 2022 #54
he has different priorities bigtree Jun 2022 #55
He also works to protect the American people and our democracy. For the last 21 years. Autumn Jun 2022 #56
not disputing anything like that bigtree Jun 2022 #57
Why haven't they interviewed the same people? edhopper Jun 2022 #60
I am sure there will be a number of DUers calling his office to set him straight. Gore1FL Jun 2022 #11
He needs to join DU to be told what's what Effete Snob Jun 2022 #15
There Are Many Here On DU Who Will Tell Him These Things Take Time SoCalDavidS Jun 2022 #16
Maybe Garland doesn't agree with Schiff and has a good reason why. fightforfreedom Jun 2022 #21
We Shall See SoCalDavidS Jun 2022 #26
If nothing at all happens to Meadows in the future you will be right. fightforfreedom Jun 2022 #29
Congress referred to the DOJ edhopper Jun 2022 #43
you mean people outside of that investigation griping about things they can't possibly know about? bigtree Jun 2022 #19
Hah! edhopper Jun 2022 #44
the info both Schiff and DOJ want is likely to be denied in any contempt proceeding bigtree Jun 2022 #46
I can't wait for your post in 2026 edhopper Jun 2022 #49
no, you must be right bigtree Jun 2022 #53
Would you rather Meadows and Sciavino be given a parking ticket ... Novara Jun 2022 #23
What If It's Neither A Parking Ticket Or A Prosecution For Murder? SoCalDavidS Jun 2022 #27
there are a lot of reasons Novara Jun 2022 #28
If they violated parking laws AND committed a murder, how about both? Scrivener7 Jun 2022 #40
+1 n/t Silent3 Jun 2022 #45
I think Adam Schiff is expertly juking the various perps, Baked Potato Jun 2022 #33
+1 gulliver Jun 2022 #52
When these hearings are finished, I don't see how Garland can refuse DemocraticPatriot Jun 2022 #58
I wish that were true edhopper Jun 2022 #59
The story is not over, yet. DemocraticPatriot Jun 2022 #61
You think you have more clout edhopper Jun 2022 #62
NO....... However, if it is necessary, I pray DemocraticPatriot Jun 2022 #63
The last part edhopper Jun 2022 #64
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Adam Schiff also doesn't ...»Reply #51