Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(28,612 posts)

8. Changing their take on substantive due process wouldn't get rid of Loving

Fri Jun 24, 2022, 10:26 AM

Jun 2022

It rests at least as much on the Equal Protection Clause.

Of course... so do most of the others listed.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

14 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

So Bret presented this chestnut. [View all] plimsoll Jun 2022 OP

Did he read Thomas' concurring opinion? Ocelot II Jun 2022 #1

The obvious response here is, plimsoll Jun 2022 #3

Kavanaugh has proven to be a serial liar. Just A Box Of Rain Jun 2022 #2

Right, plimsoll Jun 2022 #6

Well, Loving's probably safe. plimsoll Jun 2022 #9

Unless he wants a divorce and doesn't want to split assets. haele Jun 2022 #11

That would all depend on where he got married and resides misanthrope Jun 2022 #13

Another lie from Boofer boy. roamer65 Jun 2022 #4

Except we already know that Kavanaugh is a liar. griffi94 Jun 2022 #5

Clarence Thomas said the opposite although he omitted Tomconroy Jun 2022 #7

Kavanaugh will do as he's told. Midnight Writer Jun 2022 #12

He's just massaging Susan Collins' "concern" with a new lie. nt hvn_nbr_2 Jun 2022 #14