Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sop

(18,841 posts)
12. "Treatment" of certain "mentally ill" (poor) women will consist of forced sterilization (eugenics).
Sat Jun 25, 2022, 08:28 AM
Jun 2022

"The...goal of the eugenics movement was to 'breed out' undesirable traits in order to create a society with a 'superior' genetic makeup, which essentially meant reducing the population of the non-white and the mentally ill...most states had federally funded eugenics boards, and state-ordered sterilization was a common occurrence. Sterilization was seen as one of the most effective ways to stem the growth of an 'undesirable' population, since ending a woman’s reproductive capabilities meant that she would no longer be able to contribute to the population."

"The SC case Buck v. Bell (1927) decided that a Virginia law authorizing the mandatory sterilization of inmates in mental institutions was constitutional...The Supreme Court found that the Virginia law was valuable and did not violate the Constitution, and would prevent the United States from 'being swamped with incompetence'…The Court has never explicitly overturned Buck v. Bell."

"California’s 'Asexualization Acts' in the 1910s and 1920s led to the sterilization of 20,000 disproportionately Black and Mexican people who were deemed to be mentally ill. Hitler and the Nazis were reportedly inspired by California’s laws when formulating their own genocidal eugenics policies in the 1930s...Hitler wrote, 'There is today one state in which at least weak beginnings toward a better conception [of citizenship] are noticeable. Of course, it is not our model German Republic, but the United States.'"

"Throughout the 20th century, nearly 70,0000 people (overwhelmingly working-class women of color) were sterilized in over 30 states. Black women, Latina women, and Native American women were specifically targeted. From the 1930s to the 1970s, nearly one-third of the women in Puerto Rico, a U.S. territory, were coerced into sterilization when government officials claimed that Puerto Rico’s economy would benefit from a reduced population. Sterilization was so common that it became known as 'La Operación (The Operation)' among Puerto Ricans."

"Black women were also disproportionately and forcibly sterilized and subjected to reproductive abuse. In North Carolina in the 1960s, Black women made up 65 percent of all sterilizations of women, although they were only 25 percent of the population. One Black woman who was subjected to a forced hysterectomy during this time was Fannie Lou Hamer, a renowned civil rights activist. Hamer described how nonconsensual sterilizations of working-class Black women in the South were so common that they were colloquially known as a 'Mississippi appendectomy'."

"Additionally, many Native American women were sterilized against their will. According to a report by historian Jane Lawrence, the Indian Health Service was accused of sterilizing nearly 25% of Indigenous women during the 1960s and 1970s. In 1973, the year that Roe v. Wade was decided by the Supreme Court, supposedly ensuring reproductive rights for all American women, the reproductive rights of thousands of Indigenous women were entirely ignored as they were forcibly sterilized."

"Forced sterilization, especially in exchange for a sentence reduction, occurs often in the criminal legal system today. Government-sanctioned efforts to prevent incarcerated people from reproducing were widespread in the 20th century, and still continue today. In 2017, a judge in Tennessee offered to reduce the jail sentences of convicted people who appeared before him in court if they 'volunteered' to undergo sterilization. In 2009, a 21-year-old woman in West Virginia convicted of marijuana possession underwent sterilization as part of her probation. In 2018, an Oklahoma woman convicted of cashing a counterfeit check received a reduced sentence after undergoing sterilization at the suggestion of the judge.

"According to a report by the Center for Investigative Reporting, almost 150 women considered likely to return to prison were sterilized in California prisons between 2004 and 2003. Although they had to sign 'consent' forms, the procedure, when posed as an incentive for a reduced sentence, generates an ongoing debate about whether or not consent actually exists in these situations."

"Forced sterilizations in the United States are unfortunately nothing new and nothing of the past, either. Yet, judging from the reactions to the recent allegations of involuntary hysterectomies performed at ICE detention facilities, many people are under the impression that these are unprecedented atrocities that are unique to the Trump administration. Of course, it is not any individual’s personal fault for being unaware of the United States’ history with eugenics and forced sterilization; rather, it is a reflection of our education system and the history we prioritize."

https://bpr.berkeley.edu/2020/11/04/americas-forgotten-history-of-forced-sterilization/

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Maybe the GOP could have re-education camps like in China and Russia. Irish_Dem Jun 2022 #1
That's exactly what this would be. A re-education camp. Liberal In Texas Jun 2022 #5
Yes it is the rise of the fourth reich. They are not even hiding it anymore. Irish_Dem Jun 2022 #7
It wouldn't surprise me in the least... it's a sad day in Amerikkka. InAbLuEsTaTe Jun 2022 #11
That will cost tons of money ...... Lovie777 Jun 2022 #2
Heritage Foundation Article. scarletlib Jun 2022 #3
That will never happen..yes yes I know. You cannot mentally commit someone on a whim PortTack Jun 2022 #4
Hasn't stopped them in the past. 2naSalit Jun 2022 #20
Right now the law is simple and very clear. You can only commit someone who is a danger to PortTack Jun 2022 #24
That's assuming that... 2naSalit Jun 2022 #26
Rs can see the backlash coming Deminpenn Jun 2022 #6
They just bound from one completely absurd idea to the next Cosmocat Jun 2022 #8
What? No re-education for the men? LakeVermilion Jun 2022 #9
I think they are afraid women will purchase AR 15's. Emile Jun 2022 #10
"Treatment" of certain "mentally ill" (poor) women will consist of forced sterilization (eugenics). sop Jun 2022 #12
Exactly. 2naSalit Jun 2022 #21
well, if they cant find a way to lock them up, how will they mopinko Jun 2022 #13
Church bazaar. 2naSalit Jun 2022 #22
bizarre. mopinko Jun 2022 #23
Which news? This seems like it needs a link USALiberal Jun 2022 #14
let them try samnsara Jun 2022 #15
There are very few snowybirdie Jun 2022 #16
Aside from great expense, which would require taxation to support Hortensis Jun 2022 #17
Very Dickensian viva la Jun 2022 #18
One of a variety of conditions for an involuntary commitment is that a person is a danger to dameatball Jun 2022 #19
Yes, not too much of a stretch to be concerned about in this era. Hortensis Jun 2022 #27
LOL. That's a scheme for a privatizing mental health for profit, I'd wager msfiddlestix Jun 2022 #25
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Just a rumor I heard on t...»Reply #12