Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(43,451 posts)

10. I hope he explains the more specific language cues that come with more SCOTUS rulings.

Sat Jul 23, 2022, 03:31 PM

Jul 2022

Until then, here's more discussion about what courts need to do to not slide into accommodationism, which is already sliding the U.S. into minority rule theocracy.

https://brill.com/view/journals/jlrs/5/1/article-p1_1.xml?language=en

The Establishment Clause is vulnerable to accommodationism.

https://slideplayer.com/slide/4308282/14/images/2/Establishment+Clause+Three+competing+approaches%3A.jpg

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

19 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

A public request from presidential historian Michael Beschloss [View all] Grasswire2 Jul 2022 OP

I had to look that one up Alice Kramden Jul 2022 #3

Oh, great. It's OK to ignore the framers when it ... dchill Jul 2022 #4

Yes. ancianita Jul 2022 #8

The founders weren't all that religious. gab13by13 Jul 2022 #6

Will do, and love this man. ❤️ a kennedy Jul 2022 #7

People should always do this SheltieLover Jul 2022 #13

It's not difficult to understand hot2na Jul 2022 #14

More than a request NQAS Jul 2022 #15

You mean it might get worse? liberalmuse Jul 2022 #16

The Biggest Accomodation? Roy Rolling Jul 2022 #17

Spot on post. Evolve Dammit Jul 2022 #18

Thank you Michael B. Evolve Dammit Jul 2022 #19