General Discussion

Demsrule86

(71,542 posts)

5. No they didn't. Not before the midterm. Glad I cut MSNBC off in general they suck.

Reply to Lovie777 (Reply #3)

Mon Jul 25, 2022, 05:41 PM

Jul 2022

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

123 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

MSNBC: Claire McCaskill and Andrew Weissmann were complaining, trashing Garland then this happened. [View all] fightforfreedom Jul 2022 OP

Rather be surprised and wrong... Kid Berwyn Jul 2022 #1

Why would a former senator and private sector lawyer, both now on on media payroll TheProle Jul 2022 #46

For the good of the country. Kid Berwyn Jul 2022 #100

In the long run, we're better off if some of us look foolish FoxNewsSucks Jul 2022 #2

Is that before or after we lose the midterm because of such clueless comments as those two Demsrule86 Jul 2022 #7

Post removed Post removed Jul 2022 #19

THIS, DAMMIT! calimary Jul 2022 #43

Duplicate. Sorry... calimary Jul 2022 #50

There will be no take over if we win the midterm decisively and run Biden if he is healthy Demsrule86 Jul 2022 #51

+1 ancianita Jul 2022 #94

Thank you Ancianita! How are you? Demsrule86 Jul 2022 #98

Hi, Demsrule86! I'm good. You are you? ancianita Jul 2022 #101

I am recovering...still in shock that I have been so ill...I never took any meds before. Demsrule86 Jul 2022 #115

Oh no, that IS a shock! I'm so sorry you've suffered! Your advice is much appreciated. ancianita Jul 2022 #116

I am fortunate that I can afford the meds...(barely). I did not choose a plan with good Demsrule86 Jul 2022 #117

Glad you can. Meds that are priced that high priced need competitive purchasing by our govt. ancianita Jul 2022 #118

DU is fortunate for you. ancianita Jul 2022 #123

This Ferrets are Cool Jul 2022 #59

Nobody is going to lose any election because... jcgoldie Jul 2022 #52

"Nobody is going to lose an election" stopdiggin Jul 2022 #69

Its not a question of misinformation jcgoldie Jul 2022 #86

Agree in general stopdiggin Jul 2022 #89

Extra points BlueSky3 Jul 2022 #93

Walk Me Through Willto Jul 2022 #106

Really. First of all she was wrong and it is not just one person...they all pile on and yes it could Demsrule86 Jul 2022 #97

+10 Duppers Jul 2022 #79

Agree. Going to Canada Jul 2022 #99

+1, uponit7771 Jul 2022 #111

They did right .... Lovie777 Jul 2022 #3

No they didn't. Not before the midterm. Glad I cut MSNBC off in general they suck. Demsrule86 Jul 2022 #5

I disagree . .. . Lovie777 Jul 2022 #8

My only goal at this point is to win win and win...winning is the only thing that matters... Demsrule86 Jul 2022 #13

Obama SAID to hold his feet to the fire. FoxNewsSucks Jul 2022 #24

Oh so that made the shellacking Obama recceived OK? No it didn't. Obama was blamed unfairly. Demsrule86 Jul 2022 #39

ACA was the best that could get votes at the time. Nothing is not better than something. betsuni Jul 2022 #103

Yes Pres ObamA sAID That.. NOT Cha Jul 2022 #119

Lol, ok!! USALiberal Jul 2022 #17

ok lol nt Torchlight Jul 2022 #36

LanternWaste you are back!!!!! USALiberal Jul 2022 #90

I have strong opinions about the need to win elections and support Democrats...hehe. Demsrule86 Jul 2022 #44

I like Claire but this a pure bullshit...media action...for shame on both of them. Demsrule86 Jul 2022 #4

Exactly, Garland just told the entire country he will investigate everyone involved. fightforfreedom Jul 2022 #10

If it keeps the pressure on Garland etc, then it's not the worst thing OnDoutside Jul 2022 #12

It doesn't, and that's why it's a bad thing. Beastly Boy Jul 2022 #42

He's a big boy, he can take it. OnDoutside Jul 2022 #45

He sure is, but there are too many pearl clutchers among Democrats. Beastly Boy Jul 2022 #54

No one beats Susan Collins at pearl clutching SouthernDem4ever Jul 2022 #71

Yep, and time is not on their side, sort of like the boiling frog principle. Too late when you OnDoutside Jul 2022 #109

We can't take it and by that I mean the risk that we will lose the midterm because of this Demsrule86 Jul 2022 #55

On the contrary, people aren't asking for anything unreasonable, they're asking for the DOJ to do OnDoutside Jul 2022 #110

problem is, the narrative that the department stopdiggin Jul 2022 #114

that's really not the point is it? stopdiggin Jul 2022 #77

And yet, the DOJ were surprised by the evidence that the J6C turned up, 19 months after the OnDoutside Jul 2022 #108

Yes AG Garland can take it but Cha Jul 2022 #120

We must keep pressure on them, and not back down. BlueJac Jul 2022 #72

Not back down from what? Beastly Boy Jul 2022 #78

TY! Yes, It Does.. I wholeheartedly Agree! Cha Jul 2022 #121

To make such statements publicly on TV is the worst thing...She should be ashamed. Demsrule86 Jul 2022 #53

Claire.... LiberalFighter Jul 2022 #6

Help me understand.... this is Pence's chief of staff. viva la Jul 2022 #9

I thought Marc Short already testified? OnDoutside Jul 2022 #11

Not to DOJ. gab13by13 Jul 2022 #16

No, not the DOJ but previously to the J6 committee? OnDoutside Jul 2022 #18

To the committee, this was a grand jury investigating Jan 6th. fightforfreedom Jul 2022 #23

Are you sure? gab13by13 Jul 2022 #31

Short was spotted by media leaving the grand jury and confirmed he testified. Bev54 Jul 2022 #38

DOJ doesn't leak, but apparently Marc Short does. Beastly Boy Jul 2022 #49

The person interviewed is allowed to tell. vanlassie Jul 2022 #67

Absolutely, but he wasn't a DOJ employee,was he? Beastly Boy Jul 2022 #70

True. Apparently the media caught it. vanlassie Jul 2022 #73

Short testified last week. lapucelle Jul 2022 #66

He knows everything Trump and others did to try and force Pence to overturn the election. fightforfreedom Jul 2022 #20

Short was in the room at times when the coup plot was developed and executed. Fiendish Thingy Jul 2022 #28

They probably have questions about J 5-6-7 Captain Zero Jul 2022 #41

They all think they are writing some TV scriot malaise Jul 2022 #14

Thank you Malaise...it make my blood boil when some still want to hold Democrats feet to the fire. Demsrule86 Jul 2022 #57

Fully agree, MarineCombatEngineer Jul 2022 #96

What Claire McCaskill and Andrew Weissmann said, gab13by13 Jul 2022 #15

It proved Weissmann was wrong and had no idea what Garland was doing. fightforfreedom Jul 2022 #25

How was Weissmann wrong? gab13by13 Jul 2022 #34

I guess if the guy was testifying to a grand jury...there is an investigation and Weissmann Demsrule86 Jul 2022 #60

Right. Just_Vote_Dem Jul 2022 #35

How many cases has Marcy Wheeler prosecuted? gab13by13 Jul 2022 #80

A Grand Jury subpoena would likely indicate the END of an investigation. OilemFirchen Jul 2022 #37

Neither of them know exactly what Garland is doing, we know Garland has at least 4 grand juries Bev54 Jul 2022 #48

and yet feel perfectly free to warble on in front of the camera stopdiggin Jul 2022 #81

I disagree and she looks pretty silly now...I wonder if she will apologize...probably not. Demsrule86 Jul 2022 #58

Both Mc Caskill and Weismann proved themselves wrong on the air. Beastly Boy Jul 2022 #68

Thank you for this. Treefrog Jul 2022 #88

MSNBC's goal seems to be mcar Jul 2022 #21

No I think they want a tight-tight race FakeNoose Jul 2022 #27

If it is tight the GOP will win...and this shows why no one should listen to MSNBC or any Demsrule86 Jul 2022 #61

Yep mcar Jul 2022 #95

Well, Catherine Vincent Jul 2022 #22

Ha Ha! Uninformed Pundits get owned by reality. Nt Fiendish Thingy Jul 2022 #26

Hey FT...about time...hehe😊 Demsrule86 Jul 2022 #62

The "pressure" is Already On Cha Jul 2022 #29

Everybody is an expert. Everybody apparently KNOWS what the DOJ is or is not doing. Novara Jul 2022 #30

Except that DOJ didn't keep the fake elector investigation under wraps. gab13by13 Jul 2022 #40

That doesn't have anything to do with other investigations kept secret Novara Jul 2022 #56

We knew that DOJ was investigating the fake electors gab13by13 Jul 2022 #83

I think you're wrong here-it's never foolish to question the progress of an investigation into ecstatic Jul 2022 #32

Yes it is wrong when you have no idea what is truly going on and endanger the midterm. It is very Demsrule86 Jul 2022 #63

I think it's the lack of DoJ action that's endagering the midterms Silent3 Jul 2022 #105

+1, uponit7771 Jul 2022 #112

Yes the committee's finings lit a bit of a fire under the DOJ I think. triron Jul 2022 #82

I didn't see it that way mchill Jul 2022 #33

Some who turned off the show may never realize the truth and that is damaging.They should Demsrule86 Jul 2022 #65

I saw it a little differently... kentuck Jul 2022 #74

All I will say is Short is terrific in HULU's "murders in the building" JohnSJ Jul 2022 #47

I love that show!!!! Demsrule86 Jul 2022 #64

Same here JohnSJ Jul 2022 #76

There's an old Turkish saying that if you're going to eat crow, best to de-claw it first peppertree Jul 2022 #75

Yes! He's a patriot. He's smart & careful. Joinfortmill Jul 2022 #84

Weismann, along with Mueller one of the worst kick the ball down the road in history. Pepsidog Jul 2022 #85

there must be.. quickesst Jul 2022 #87

Thought it was strange that nicolle wallace let claire yorkster Jul 2022 #91

Way too much sanctimonious, excessive relief from you Garland supporters. Paladin Jul 2022 #92

I agree Willto Jul 2022 #107

+1, uponit7771 Jul 2022 #113

I for one am not a bit concerned with looking foolish Meowmee Jul 2022 #102

Can I complain the DoJ is already too late? Silent3 Jul 2022 #104

You characterized Andrew Weisman "complaining" .... msfiddlestix Jul 2022 #122