General Discussion

viva la

(4,599 posts)

9. Help me understand.... this is Pence's chief of staff.

Reply to fightforfreedom (Original post)

Mon Jul 25, 2022, 05:48 PM

Jul 2022

During Jan 6, he was back at the White House? Or was he with Pence at the Capitol?

What would he be testifying about?

It's so hard to keep all the details organized!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

123 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

MSNBC: Claire McCaskill and Andrew Weissmann were complaining, trashing Garland then this happened. [View all] fightforfreedom Jul 2022 OP

Rather be surprised and wrong... Kid Berwyn Jul 2022 #1

Why would a former senator and private sector lawyer, both now on on media payroll TheProle Jul 2022 #46

For the good of the country. Kid Berwyn Jul 2022 #100

In the long run, we're better off if some of us look foolish FoxNewsSucks Jul 2022 #2

Is that before or after we lose the midterm because of such clueless comments as those two Demsrule86 Jul 2022 #7

Post removed Post removed Jul 2022 #19

THIS, DAMMIT! calimary Jul 2022 #43

Duplicate. Sorry... calimary Jul 2022 #50

There will be no take over if we win the midterm decisively and run Biden if he is healthy Demsrule86 Jul 2022 #51

+1 ancianita Jul 2022 #94

Thank you Ancianita! How are you? Demsrule86 Jul 2022 #98

Hi, Demsrule86! I'm good. You are you? ancianita Jul 2022 #101

I am recovering...still in shock that I have been so ill...I never took any meds before. Demsrule86 Jul 2022 #115

Oh no, that IS a shock! I'm so sorry you've suffered! Your advice is much appreciated. ancianita Jul 2022 #116

I am fortunate that I can afford the meds...(barely). I did not choose a plan with good Demsrule86 Jul 2022 #117

Glad you can. Meds that are priced that high priced need competitive purchasing by our govt. ancianita Jul 2022 #118

DU is fortunate for you. ancianita Jul 2022 #123

This Ferrets are Cool Jul 2022 #59

Nobody is going to lose any election because... jcgoldie Jul 2022 #52

"Nobody is going to lose an election" stopdiggin Jul 2022 #69

Its not a question of misinformation jcgoldie Jul 2022 #86

Agree in general stopdiggin Jul 2022 #89

Extra points BlueSky3 Jul 2022 #93

Walk Me Through Willto Jul 2022 #106

Really. First of all she was wrong and it is not just one person...they all pile on and yes it could Demsrule86 Jul 2022 #97

+10 Duppers Jul 2022 #79

Agree. Going to Canada Jul 2022 #99

+1, uponit7771 Jul 2022 #111

They did right .... Lovie777 Jul 2022 #3

No they didn't. Not before the midterm. Glad I cut MSNBC off in general they suck. Demsrule86 Jul 2022 #5

I disagree . .. . Lovie777 Jul 2022 #8

My only goal at this point is to win win and win...winning is the only thing that matters... Demsrule86 Jul 2022 #13

Obama SAID to hold his feet to the fire. FoxNewsSucks Jul 2022 #24

Oh so that made the shellacking Obama recceived OK? No it didn't. Obama was blamed unfairly. Demsrule86 Jul 2022 #39

ACA was the best that could get votes at the time. Nothing is not better than something. betsuni Jul 2022 #103

Yes Pres ObamA sAID That.. NOT Cha Jul 2022 #119

Lol, ok!! USALiberal Jul 2022 #17

ok lol nt Torchlight Jul 2022 #36

LanternWaste you are back!!!!! USALiberal Jul 2022 #90

I have strong opinions about the need to win elections and support Democrats...hehe. Demsrule86 Jul 2022 #44

I like Claire but this a pure bullshit...media action...for shame on both of them. Demsrule86 Jul 2022 #4

Exactly, Garland just told the entire country he will investigate everyone involved. fightforfreedom Jul 2022 #10

If it keeps the pressure on Garland etc, then it's not the worst thing OnDoutside Jul 2022 #12

It doesn't, and that's why it's a bad thing. Beastly Boy Jul 2022 #42

He's a big boy, he can take it. OnDoutside Jul 2022 #45

He sure is, but there are too many pearl clutchers among Democrats. Beastly Boy Jul 2022 #54

No one beats Susan Collins at pearl clutching SouthernDem4ever Jul 2022 #71

Yep, and time is not on their side, sort of like the boiling frog principle. Too late when you OnDoutside Jul 2022 #109

We can't take it and by that I mean the risk that we will lose the midterm because of this Demsrule86 Jul 2022 #55

On the contrary, people aren't asking for anything unreasonable, they're asking for the DOJ to do OnDoutside Jul 2022 #110

problem is, the narrative that the department stopdiggin Jul 2022 #114

that's really not the point is it? stopdiggin Jul 2022 #77

And yet, the DOJ were surprised by the evidence that the J6C turned up, 19 months after the OnDoutside Jul 2022 #108

Yes AG Garland can take it but Cha Jul 2022 #120

We must keep pressure on them, and not back down. BlueJac Jul 2022 #72

Not back down from what? Beastly Boy Jul 2022 #78

TY! Yes, It Does.. I wholeheartedly Agree! Cha Jul 2022 #121

To make such statements publicly on TV is the worst thing...She should be ashamed. Demsrule86 Jul 2022 #53

Claire.... LiberalFighter Jul 2022 #6

Help me understand.... this is Pence's chief of staff. viva la Jul 2022 #9

I thought Marc Short already testified? OnDoutside Jul 2022 #11

Not to DOJ. gab13by13 Jul 2022 #16

No, not the DOJ but previously to the J6 committee? OnDoutside Jul 2022 #18

To the committee, this was a grand jury investigating Jan 6th. fightforfreedom Jul 2022 #23

Are you sure? gab13by13 Jul 2022 #31

Short was spotted by media leaving the grand jury and confirmed he testified. Bev54 Jul 2022 #38

DOJ doesn't leak, but apparently Marc Short does. Beastly Boy Jul 2022 #49

The person interviewed is allowed to tell. vanlassie Jul 2022 #67

Absolutely, but he wasn't a DOJ employee,was he? Beastly Boy Jul 2022 #70

True. Apparently the media caught it. vanlassie Jul 2022 #73

Short testified last week. lapucelle Jul 2022 #66

He knows everything Trump and others did to try and force Pence to overturn the election. fightforfreedom Jul 2022 #20

Short was in the room at times when the coup plot was developed and executed. Fiendish Thingy Jul 2022 #28

They probably have questions about J 5-6-7 Captain Zero Jul 2022 #41

They all think they are writing some TV scriot malaise Jul 2022 #14

Thank you Malaise...it make my blood boil when some still want to hold Democrats feet to the fire. Demsrule86 Jul 2022 #57

Fully agree, MarineCombatEngineer Jul 2022 #96

What Claire McCaskill and Andrew Weissmann said, gab13by13 Jul 2022 #15

It proved Weissmann was wrong and had no idea what Garland was doing. fightforfreedom Jul 2022 #25

How was Weissmann wrong? gab13by13 Jul 2022 #34

I guess if the guy was testifying to a grand jury...there is an investigation and Weissmann Demsrule86 Jul 2022 #60

Right. Just_Vote_Dem Jul 2022 #35

How many cases has Marcy Wheeler prosecuted? gab13by13 Jul 2022 #80

A Grand Jury subpoena would likely indicate the END of an investigation. OilemFirchen Jul 2022 #37

Neither of them know exactly what Garland is doing, we know Garland has at least 4 grand juries Bev54 Jul 2022 #48

and yet feel perfectly free to warble on in front of the camera stopdiggin Jul 2022 #81

I disagree and she looks pretty silly now...I wonder if she will apologize...probably not. Demsrule86 Jul 2022 #58

Both Mc Caskill and Weismann proved themselves wrong on the air. Beastly Boy Jul 2022 #68

Thank you for this. Treefrog Jul 2022 #88

MSNBC's goal seems to be mcar Jul 2022 #21

No I think they want a tight-tight race FakeNoose Jul 2022 #27

If it is tight the GOP will win...and this shows why no one should listen to MSNBC or any Demsrule86 Jul 2022 #61

Yep mcar Jul 2022 #95

Well, Catherine Vincent Jul 2022 #22

Ha Ha! Uninformed Pundits get owned by reality. Nt Fiendish Thingy Jul 2022 #26

Hey FT...about time...hehe😊 Demsrule86 Jul 2022 #62

The "pressure" is Already On Cha Jul 2022 #29

Everybody is an expert. Everybody apparently KNOWS what the DOJ is or is not doing. Novara Jul 2022 #30

Except that DOJ didn't keep the fake elector investigation under wraps. gab13by13 Jul 2022 #40

That doesn't have anything to do with other investigations kept secret Novara Jul 2022 #56

We knew that DOJ was investigating the fake electors gab13by13 Jul 2022 #83

I think you're wrong here-it's never foolish to question the progress of an investigation into ecstatic Jul 2022 #32

Yes it is wrong when you have no idea what is truly going on and endanger the midterm. It is very Demsrule86 Jul 2022 #63

I think it's the lack of DoJ action that's endagering the midterms Silent3 Jul 2022 #105

+1, uponit7771 Jul 2022 #112

Yes the committee's finings lit a bit of a fire under the DOJ I think. triron Jul 2022 #82

I didn't see it that way mchill Jul 2022 #33

Some who turned off the show may never realize the truth and that is damaging.They should Demsrule86 Jul 2022 #65

I saw it a little differently... kentuck Jul 2022 #74

All I will say is Short is terrific in HULU's "murders in the building" JohnSJ Jul 2022 #47

I love that show!!!! Demsrule86 Jul 2022 #64

Same here JohnSJ Jul 2022 #76

There's an old Turkish saying that if you're going to eat crow, best to de-claw it first peppertree Jul 2022 #75

Yes! He's a patriot. He's smart & careful. Joinfortmill Jul 2022 #84

Weismann, along with Mueller one of the worst kick the ball down the road in history. Pepsidog Jul 2022 #85

there must be.. quickesst Jul 2022 #87

Thought it was strange that nicolle wallace let claire yorkster Jul 2022 #91

Way too much sanctimonious, excessive relief from you Garland supporters. Paladin Jul 2022 #92

I agree Willto Jul 2022 #107

+1, uponit7771 Jul 2022 #113

I for one am not a bit concerned with looking foolish Meowmee Jul 2022 #102

Can I complain the DoJ is already too late? Silent3 Jul 2022 #104

You characterized Andrew Weisman "complaining" .... msfiddlestix Jul 2022 #122