Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The missile that got al Zawahiri didn't use explosives [View all]Atticus
(15,124 posts)4. So, now his followers can truly be "piece keepers"! Professor---rimshot, please! nt
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
49 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
So, now his followers can truly be "piece keepers"! Professor---rimshot, please! nt
Atticus
Aug 2022
#4
You have to recognize what Putin's goals are, & they have nothing to do with accuracy...
Hekate
Aug 2022
#45
Norelco is coming out with a version for men on the go who want a close shave.
Beakybird
Aug 2022
#21
As you say (and he does too), he's a retired journalist, ie ex-reporter
muriel_volestrangler
Aug 2022
#27
The point is he's not a reporter out there, or working in a current newsroom
muriel_volestrangler
Aug 2022
#34
The "explosion" the heard was likely the missile hitting the target at about Mach 1.3
MarineCombatEngineer
Aug 2022
#36
Well it was still a jet powered steel tube, with a load of fuel and traveling 600 mph.
fescuerescue
Aug 2022
#33