Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: This is surely not the flex she thinks it is [View all]erronis
(18,363 posts)65. And I tend to agree with you and others. However if the OP had cited that this was a
restatement of Hitler's quote, and even better supplied a link or two to mjt's and her boyfriend hitler's utterances it would have avoided all of this discussion.
I also think DU should have more categories about why we object to a post.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
66 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

He said so many things there's probably a quote-a-day for sale on some GOP website.
NullTuples
Aug 2022
#43
What's frightening is how many people seem to think MTG literally quoted Hitler.
WhiskeyGrinder
Aug 2022
#23
I think what's frightening is that she paraphrases Hitler. Literally the same idea, different words
ancianita
Aug 2022
#26
Unbelievable. Just that alone would make me never speak with her even if I was a Repug Rep.
Fla Dem
Aug 2022
#12
May not be an exact quotation from her, but have SEEN her making similar statement.
elleng
Aug 2022
#16
Hate to say I voted that this broke the rules. If it is fake (which it appears to be),
erronis
Aug 2022
#24
I think you were wrong there; there isn't a specific rule about word-for-word accuracy
muriel_volestrangler
Aug 2022
#63
And I tend to agree with you and others. However if the OP had cited that this was a
erronis
Aug 2022
#65